Literature DB >> 12640974

[Genetic research on blood samples stored for years in biobanks. Most people are willing to provide informed consent].

Birgitta Stegmayr1, Kjell Asplund.   

Abstract

Genetic research involving biobanks has been the subject of numerous declarations, recommendations and guidelines produced by professionals, administrators, legislators and other decision-makers. Yet, there is little published empirical information on people's willingness to participate in genetic studies on blood samples that they donated many years ago, at a time when the informed consent did not include the possibility of genetic research. We here report on our experiences of obtaining informed consent for academic and as well as commercial genetic research on blood samples collected more than a decade ago. Participants in a population-based risk factor survey who had donated blood to a biobank in 1990 were contacted eleven years later (in 2001) and asked for informed consent for genetic studies. A total of 1,311 out of 1,409 participants (93%) gave their consent to use blood samples for academic genetic research, provided that an Ethics Committee had approved the research. Thirty-one participants (2.2%) did not give their consent for academic genetic research. Another 35 subjects (2.5%) did not consent to industrial genetic research even if their blood samples were anonymized. Sixty-four individuals did not reply or provided incomplete answers (together 4.8%). Of the 1,311 individuals that agreed to participate, 292 (22.3%) wanted to be informed and give their concent to every new specific project. All the others gave a general concent provided that an Ethics Committee had approved the research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12640974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lakartidningen        ISSN: 0023-7205


  5 in total

1.  Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework.

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Arthur L Caplan
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Bodily rights and property rights.

Authors:  B Björkman; S O Hansson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Different types--different rights. Distinguishing between different perspectives on ownership of biological material.

Authors:  Barbro Björkman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Biobanks for genomics and genomics for biobanks.

Authors:  Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Pascal Ducournau; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; David Pontille
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

5.  Consent for the use of human biological samples for biomedical research: a mixed methods study exploring the UK public's preferences.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Margaret Clotworthy; Shona Hilton; Caroline Magee; Mark J Robertson; Lesley J Stubbins; Julie Corfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.