Literature DB >> 12630831

Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes.

Jochen Zeil1, Martin I Hofmann, Javaan S Chahl.   

Abstract

We took panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes at regular intervals in two- or three-dimensional grids covering 1 m2 or 1 m3 and determined how the root mean square pixel differences between each of the images and a reference image acquired at one of the locations in the grid develop over distance from the reference position. We then asked whether the reference position can be pinpointed from a random starting position by moving the panoramic imaging device in such a way that the image differences relative to the reference image are minimized. We find that on time scales of minutes to hours, outdoor locations are accurately defined by a clear, sharp minimum in a smooth three-dimensional (3D) volume of image differences (the 3D difference function). 3D difference functions depend on the spatial-frequency content of natural scenes and on the spatial layout of objects therein. They become steeper in the vicinity of dominant objects. Their shape and smoothness, however, are affected by changes in illumination and shadows. The difference functions generated by rotation are similar in shape to those generated by translation, but their plateau values are higher. Rotational difference functions change little with distance from the reference location. Simple gradient descent methods are surprisingly successful in recovering a goal location, even if faced with transient changes in illumination. Our results show that view-based homing with panoramic images is in principle feasible in natural environments and does not require the identification of individual landmarks. We discuss the relevance of our findings to the study of robot and insect homing.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12630831     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.20.000450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  56 in total

1.  Visual input and path stabilization in walking ants.

Authors:  Sebastian Schwarz; Antoine Wystrach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Image-matching during ant navigation occurs through saccade-like body turns controlled by learned visual features.

Authors:  David D Lent; Paul Graham; Thomas S Collett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; Sarah Gourmaud; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Alex T Keinath; Joshua B Julian; Russell A Epstein; Isabel A Muzzio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Responses of blowfly motion-sensitive neurons to reconstructed optic flow along outdoor flight paths.

Authors:  N Boeddeker; J P Lindemann; M Egelhaaf; J Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course?

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Patrick Schultheiss; Guy Beugnon; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Place memory in crickets.

Authors:  Jan Wessnitzer; Michael Mangan; Barbara Webb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant?

Authors:  Paul Graham; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Looking and homing: how displaced ants decide where to go.

Authors:  Jochen Zeil; Ajay Narendra; Wolfgang Stürzl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Treating hummingbirds as feathered bees: a case of ethological cross-pollination.

Authors:  D J Pritchard; M C Tello Ramos; F Muth; S D Healy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.