Literature DB >> 22446548

Visual input and path stabilization in walking ants.

Sebastian Schwarz1, Antoine Wystrach.   

Abstract

Most animals use vision to navigate the outside world. Eyes are the sensory organs for visual perception and can vary in their form, structure and function to suit the visual requirement of the individual species. In insects, mainly the two compound eyes but also the less-conspicuous ocelli are in charge for visual input. Much knowledge has been obtained about compound eyes but little is known about the role of ocelli in walking insects. Recently it has been shown that ant ocelli contribute to encoding celestial compass information for homing. However, ocelli could not compute terrestrial cues for navigating back to the nest. Here we focus on further investigations on the ants' paths stabilization under different visual input conditions. The pitch and roll stabilization of walking paths seems to be independent of visual input and controlled by idiothetic cues. The yaw (meander) stabilisation in walking paths is adjusted for navigational rather than for stabilizing purposes and depends on at least three factors: the odometric component of the path integrator (via idiothetic cues), the perception of the celestial compass information (via ocelli and compound eyes), and the visual matching of the familiar route scenery (via the compound eyes).

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22446548      PMCID: PMC3306352          DOI: 10.4161/cib.17730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Integr Biol        ISSN: 1942-0889


  12 in total

1.  Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes.

Authors:  Jochen Zeil; Martin I Hofmann; Javaan S Chahl
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Image-matching during ant navigation occurs through saccade-like body turns controlled by learned visual features.

Authors:  David D Lent; Paul Graham; Thomas S Collett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Animal cognition: multi-modal interactions in ant learning.

Authors:  Paul Graham; Andrew Philippides; Bart Baddeley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The properties of the visual system in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Sebastian Schwarz; Ajay Narendra; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  Arthropod Struct Dev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  Idiosyncratic route-based memories in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti: how do they interact with path-integration vectors?

Authors:  Martin Kohler; Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course?

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Patrick Schultheiss; Guy Beugnon; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Ocelli contribute to the encoding of celestial compass information in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Sebastian Schwarz; Laurence Albert; Antoine Wystrach; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Geometry, features, and panoramic views: ants in rectangular arenas.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Ken Cheng; Sebastian Sosa; Guy Beugnon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-10

10.  Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.