Literature DB >> 20972570

Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course?

Antoine Wystrach1, Sebastian Schwarz, Patrick Schultheiss, Guy Beugnon, Ken Cheng.   

Abstract

The Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti often follows stereotypical routes through a cluttered landscape containing both distant panoramic views and obstacles (plants) to navigate around. We created an artificial obstacle course for the ants between a feeder and their nest. Landmarks comprised natural objects in the landscape such as logs, branches, and tussocks. Many ants travelled stereotypical routes home through the obstacle course in training, threading repeatedly the same gaps in the landmarks. Manipulations altering the relations between the landmarks and the surrounding panorama, however, affected the routes in two major ways. Both interchanging the positions of landmarks (transpositions) and displacing the entire landmark set along with the starting position of the ants (translations) (1) reduced the stereotypicality of the route, and (2) increased turns and meanders during travel. The ants might have used the entire panorama in view-based travel, or the distal panorama might prime the identification and use of landmarks en route. Despite the large data set, both options (not mutually exclusive) remain viable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972570     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0597-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  26 in total

1.  Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes.

Authors:  Jochen Zeil; Martin I Hofmann; Javaan S Chahl
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Motivation and vector navigation in honey bees.

Authors:  Fred C Dyer; Micah Gill; Jennifer Sharbowski
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2002-06

3.  Acquiring, retaining and integrating memories of the outbound distance in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; Ken Cheng; Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant?

Authors:  Paul Graham; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Ants learn geometry and features.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Guy Beugnon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The locale map of honey bees: do insects have cognitive maps?

Authors:  J L Gould
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Honeybee memory: navigation by associative grouping and recall of visual stimuli.

Authors:  S W Zhang; M Lehrer; M V Srinivasan
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  The connection between landscapes and the solar ephemeris in honeybees.

Authors:  William F Towne; Heather Moscrip
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The influence of beacon-aiming on the routes of wood ants.

Authors:  Paul Graham; Karine Fauria; Thomas S Collett
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  Do animals have cognitive maps?

Authors:  A T Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  19 in total

1.  Visual input and path stabilization in walking ants.

Authors:  Sebastian Schwarz; Antoine Wystrach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Optimal cue integration in ants.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Michael Mangan; Barbara Webb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Backtracking behaviour in lost ants: an additional strategy in their navigational toolkit.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Alice Baniel; Ken Cheng
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Rotation invariant visual processing for spatial memory in insects.

Authors:  Thomas Stone; Michael Mangan; Antoine Wystrach; Barbara Webb
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Skyline retention and retroactive interference in the navigating Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Christopher Whyte; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Visual scanning behaviours and their role in the navigation of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Andrew Philippides; Amandine Aurejac; Ken Cheng; Paul Graham
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The effect of spatially restricted experience on extrapolating learned views in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Sudhakar Deeti; Kazuki Fujii; Ken Cheng
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Steering intermediate courses: desert ants combine information from various navigational routines.

Authors:  Rüdiger Wehner; Thierry Hoinville; Holk Cruse; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Landmarks or panoramas: what do navigating ants attend to for guidance?

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Guy Beugnon; Ken Cheng
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 10.  Bio-inspired polarized skylight-based navigation sensors: a review.

Authors:  Salmah B Karman; S Zaleha M Diah; Ille C Gebeshuber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.