Literature DB >> 26491012

Evaluating the Use of Antibody Variable Region (Fv) Charge as a Risk Assessment Tool for Predicting Typical Cynomolgus Monkey Pharmacokinetics.

Daniela Bumbaca Yadav1, Vikas K Sharma2, Charles Andrew Boswell1, Isidro Hotzel3, Devin Tesar4, Yonglei Shang3, Yong Ying5, Saloumeh K Fischer5, Jane L Grogan6, Eugene Y Chiang6, Konnie Urban7, Sheila Ulufatu7, Leslie A Khawli1, Saileta Prabhu1, Sean Joseph1, Robert F Kelley8.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of monoclonal antibodies in cynomolgus monkeys (cynos) is generally translatable to that in humans. Unfortunately, about 39% of the antibodies evaluated for PKs in cynos have fast nonspecific (or non-target-mediated) clearance (in-house data). An empirical model relating variable region (Fv) charge and hydrophobicity to cyno nonspecific clearance was developed to gauge the risk an antibody would have for fast nonspecific clearance in the monkey. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictability of this empirical model on cyno nonspecific clearance with antibodies specifically engineered to have either high or low Fv charge. These amino acid changes were made in the Fv region of two test antibodies, humAb4D5-8 and anti-lymphotoxin α. The humAb4D5-8 has a typical nonspecific clearance in cynos, and by making it more positively charged, the antibody acquires fast nonspecific clearance, and making it less positively charged did not impact its clearance. Anti-lymphotoxin α has fast nonspecific clearance in cynos, and making it more positively charged caused it to clear even faster, whereas making it less positively charged caused it to clear slower and within the typical range. These trends in clearance were also observed in two other preclinical species, mice and rats. The effect of modifying Fv charge on subcutaneous bioavailability was also examined, and in general bioavailability was inversely related to the direction of the Fv charge change. Thus, modifying Fv charge appears to impact antibody PKs, and the changes tended to correlate with those predicted by the empirical model.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibody; antibody engineering; charge; clearance; homology modeling; mutant; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26491012      PMCID: PMC4705991          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.692434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  44 in total

Review 1.  Immunogenicity to therapeutic proteins: impact on PK/PD and efficacy.

Authors:  Narendra Chirmule; Vibha Jawa; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis.

Authors:  B C Cunningham; J A Wells
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Mapping out regions on the surface of the aspartate receptor that are essential for kinase activation.

Authors:  Ryan S Mehan; Noah C White; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Interspecies scaling, allometry, physiological time, and the ground plan of pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  H Boxenbaum
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1982-04

5.  Off-target platelet activation in macaques unique to a therapeutic monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Michael J Santostefano; Jacqueline Kirchner; Christine Vissinga; Madeline Fort; Sean Lear; Wei-Jian Pan; Peter J Prince; Kelly M Hensley; Duc Tran; Dan Rock; Hugo M Vargas; Padma Narayanan; Remi Jawando; William Rees; James F Reindel; Kai Reynhardt; Nancy Everds
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Improved tumor localization and radioimaging with chemically modified monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  L A Khawli; M S Glasky; M M Alauddin; A L Epstein
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  Structure of the extracellular region of HER2 alone and in complex with the Herceptin Fab.

Authors:  Hyun-Soo Cho; Karen Mason; Kasra X Ramyar; Ann Marie Stanley; Sandra B Gabelli; Dan W Denney; Daniel J Leahy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Monoclonal antibody radiopharmaceuticals: cationization, pegylation, radiometal chelation, pharmacokinetics, and tumor imaging.

Authors:  Hwa Jeong Lee; William M Pardridge
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.774

9.  Comparison of IgG diffusion and extracellular matrix composition in rhabdomyosarcomas grown in mice versus in vitro as spheroids reveals the role of host stromal cells.

Authors:  C de L Davies; D A Berk; A Pluen; R K Jain
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Development of humanized bispecific antibodies reactive with cytotoxic lymphocytes and tumor cells overexpressing the HER2 protooncogene.

Authors:  M R Shalaby; H M Shepard; L Presta; M L Rodrigues; P C Beverley; M Feldmann; P Carter
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for the Design of Antibody-Based Therapeutics.

Authors:  Dennis R Goulet; William M Atkins
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 2.  Structure, heterogeneity and developability assessment of therapeutic antibodies.

Authors:  Yingda Xu; Dongdong Wang; Bruce Mason; Tony Rossomando; Ning Li; Dingjiang Liu; Jason K Cheung; Wei Xu; Smita Raghava; Amit Katiyar; Christine Nowak; Tao Xiang; Diane D Dong; Joanne Sun; Alain Beck; Hongcheng Liu
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic de-risking tools for selection of monoclonal antibody lead candidates.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Thomayant Prueksaritanont; Robert F Kelley
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.857

4.  Impact of SPR biosensor assay configuration on antibody: Neonatal Fc receptor binding data.

Authors:  Xiangdan Wang; Patrick McKay; Liliana T Yee; George Dutina; Philip E Hass; Ihsan Nijem; David Allison; Kyra J Cowan; Kevin Lin; Valerie Quarmby; Jihong Yang
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 5.  Next generation antibody drugs: pursuit of the 'high-hanging fruit'.

Authors:  Paul J Carter; Greg A Lazar
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Establishing in vitro in vivo correlations to screen monoclonal antibodies for physicochemical properties related to favorable human pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Lindsay B Avery; Jason Wade; Mengmeng Wang; Amy Tam; Amy King; Nicole Piche-Nicholas; Mania S Kavosi; Steve Penn; David Cirelli; Jeffrey C Kurz; Minlei Zhang; Orla Cunningham; Rhys Jones; Brian J Fennell; Barry McDonnell; Paul Sakorafas; James Apgar; William J Finlay; Laura Lin; Laird Bloom; Denise M O'Hara
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.857

7.  Predicting monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration via whole-body physiologically-based modeling.

Authors:  Shihao Hu; David Z D'Argenio
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Physicochemical Rules for Identifying Monoclonal Antibodies with Drug-like Specificity.

Authors:  Yulei Zhang; Lina Wu; Priyanka Gupta; Alec A Desai; Matthew D Smith; Lilia A Rabia; Seth D Ludwig; Peter M Tessier
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Selecting and engineering monoclonal antibodies with drug-like specificity.

Authors:  Charles G Starr; Peter M Tessier
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 10.  Challenges and Opportunities for the Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins.

Authors:  Michael R Turner; Sathy V Balu-Iyer
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.