Literature DB >> 12621181

Breast reconstruction in older women: advantages of autogenous tissue.

Joan E Lipa1, Adel A Youssef, Henry M Kuerer, Geoffrey L Robb, David W Chang.   

Abstract

As the population ages, the treatment of breast cancer among elderly women is becoming increasingly common. Decisions with regard to breast reconstruction require not only consideration of patient age and comorbidities but also a need to balance life expectancy with quality of life. Although it is often assumed that implant-based breast reconstruction is the least disruptive method, especially among patients who may be facing limited survival times, it was hypothesized that autogenous tissue breast reconstruction is a well-tolerated and perhaps preferable means of reconstruction for older women who choose to undergo reconstruction following mastectomy. No large series of autogenous tissue reconstructions in this age group has been presented. A retrospective study of 84 postmastectomy reconstructions (66 unilateral and 18 bilateral; 78.6 percent immediate) performed at the authors' institution for 81 women 65 years of age or older, between April of 1987 and December of 2000, was undertaken. Reconstructions were implant-based ( = 26), latissimus dorsi flap-based ( = 24), or transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap-based ( = 34). Of the 34 TRAM flaps, 21 were free or supercharged. Breast complications were more frequent ( < 0.05) among recipients of implant-based reconstructions (76.9 percent) than among recipients of latissimus dorsi flap (41.7 percent) or TRAM flap (35.3 percent) reconstructions. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, comorbidities, smoking, radiotherapy, and body mass index had no effect. Medical complications without long-term sequelae were observed for two patients who underwent latissimus dorsi flap reconstructions and two patients who underwent free TRAM flap reconstructions; the difference in the rates of medical complications was not significant. At the mean follow-up time of 4.2 years, 92.8 percent of all study patients exhibited no evidence of disease. Notably, despite being free of disease, seven of the 26 patients (27 percent) who underwent implant-based reconstructions abandoned further reconstructive efforts after complications necessitated implant removal. It was concluded that age alone should not determine the type of breast reconstruction and that autogenous tissue breast reconstruction can be a safe successful alternative for women 65 years of age or older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12621181     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000046614.84464.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction rate and profile in a Singapore patient population: a National University Hospital experience.

Authors:  Nadia Sim; Sharon Soh; Chuan Han Ang; Chor Hoong Hing; Han Jing Lee; Vigneswaran Nallathamby; Yan Lin Yap; Wei Chen Ong; Thiam Chye Lim; Jane Lim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Choices in surgery for older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Vikram Swaminathan; Markos K Spiliopoulos; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Breast reconstruction in the high-risk population: current review of the literature and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Margaret S Roubaud; Joseph N Carey; Emma Vartanian; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Age and Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Luis Chang-Azancot; Pedro Abizanda; María Gijón; Nitzan Kenig; Manuel Campello; Jessica Juez; Antonio Talaya; Gregorio Gómez-Bajo; Javier Montón; Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 7.  Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Romina Deldar; Adaah A Sayyed; Parhom Towfighi; Nathan Aminpour; Olutayo Sogunro; Jennifer D Son; Kenneth L Fan; David H Song
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.269

Review 8.  A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Complications Related to Breast Reconstruction Using Different Skin Flaps After Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Jiahua Xing; Ziqi Jia; Yichi Xu; Muzi Chen; Youbai Chen; Yan Han
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

10.  Breast Reconstruction with Microvascular MS-TRAM and DIEP Flaps.

Authors:  David W Chang
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.