Literature DB >> 12612173

Biologic and methodologic issues for nutritional biomarkers.

Nancy Potischman1.   

Abstract

Nutritional biomarkers are used for a variety of purposes in large-scale population surveys and epidemiologic studies as well as smaller clinical studies. The main reasons for using nutritional biomarkers are to provide measures of nutritional status that have less error than dietary data, nutrient status for nutrients with inadequate dietary data, to obtain a more proximal and integrated assessment of nutrient status that incorporates metabolism, to assess dietary change and compliance in intervention studies, and dietary intake for the validation of dietary questionnaires. However, often there is oversight by the investigators regarding biologic and laboratory issues, which have implications for the utility of nutritional biomarkers. This article reviews some of the physiologic issues that contribute to between-person variability in nutrient status and the utility and meaning of specimens from various body compartments. Issues related to the collection and storage of biologic specimens are addressed, although it is recommended that investigators contact laboratory colleagues at the beginning of any study for updated information. The necessity for blind quality surveillance of laboratory analyses beyond the normal procedures employed by collaborating laboratories also is addressed. The advantages and disadvantages of nutritional biomarkers are reviewed, especially in comparison with using dietary methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12612173     DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.3.875S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  59 in total

1.  Combined measure of pro- and anti-oxidant exposures in relation to prostate cancer and colorectal adenoma risk: an update.

Authors:  Michael Goodman; Roberd M Bostick; Myron Gross; Bharat Thyagarajan; Chiranjeev Dash; W Dana Flanders
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Secular trends in regional differences in nutritional biomarkers and self-reported dietary intakes among American adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1988-1994 to 2009-2010.

Authors:  Ashima K Kant; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 3.  [Limits and relevance of the laboratory diagnosis of malnutrition in the elderly].

Authors:  Alexander Lapin
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2006-03

Review 4.  Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: applications, needs and new horizons.

Authors:  Mazda Jenab; Nadia Slimani; Magda Bictash; Pietro Ferrari; Sheila A Bingham
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Markers for nutrition studies: review of criteria for the evaluation of markers.

Authors:  Jan de Vries; Jean-Michel Antoine; Tomasz Burzykowski; Alessandro Chiodini; Mike Gibney; Gunter Kuhnle; Agnès Méheust; Loek Pijls; Ian Rowland
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Association of red blood cell n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids with plasma inflammatory biomarkers among the Quebec Cree population.

Authors:  M-È Labonté; E Dewailly; M Lucas; P Couture; B Lamarche
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for circulating phylloquinone concentrations.

Authors:  Hassan S Dashti; M Kyla Shea; Caren E Smith; Toshiko Tanaka; Adela Hruby; Kris Richardson; Thomas J Wang; Mike A Nalls; Xiuqing Guo; Yongmei Liu; Jie Yao; Dalin Li; W Craig Johnson; Emelia J Benjamin; Stephen B Kritchevsky; David S Siscovick; José M Ordovás; Sarah L Booth
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  The Importance and Challenges of Dietary Intervention Trials for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Lindsey Albenberg; Dale Lee; Mario Kratz; Klaus Gottlieb; Walter Reinisch
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 9.  Challenges and Lessons Learned in Generating and Interpreting NHANES Nutritional Biomarker Data.

Authors:  Christine M Pfeiffer; David A Lacher; Rosemary L Schleicher; Clifford L Johnson; Elizabeth A Yetley
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.701

10.  Can we use biomarkers in combination with self-reports to strengthen the analysis of nutritional epidemiologic studies?

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Victor Kipnis; Arthur Schatzkin; Natasa Tasevska; Nancy Potischman
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2010-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.