Literature DB >> 11048871

Testing shelled corn for aflatoxin, Part I: estimation of variance components.

A S Johansson1, T B Whitaker, W M Hagler, F G Giesbrecht, J H Young, D T Bowman.   

Abstract

The variability associated with testing lots of shelled corn for aflatoxin was investigated. Eighteen lots of shelled corn were tested for aflatoxin contamination. The total variance associated with testing shelled corn was estimated and partitioned into sampling, sample preparation, and analytical variances. All variances increased as aflatoxin concentration increased. With the use of regression analysis, mathematical expressions were developed to model the relationship between aflatoxin concentration and the total, sampling, sample preparation, and analytical variances. The expressions for these relationships were used to estimate the variance for any sample size, subsample size, and number of analyses for a specific aflatoxin concentration. Test results on a lot with 20 parts per billion aflatoxin using a 1.13 kg sample, a Romer mill, 50 g subsamples, and liquid chromatographic analysis showed that the total, sampling, sample preparation, and analytical variances were 274.9 (CV = 82.9%), 214.0 (CV = 73.1 %), 56.3 (CV = 37.5%), and 4.6 (CV = 10.7%), respectively. The percentage of the total variance for sampling, sample preparation, and analytical was 77.8, 20.5, and 1.7, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11048871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  8 in total

Review 1.  Detecting mycotoxins in agricultural commodities.

Authors:  Thomas B Whitaker
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Mycotoxin Analysis of Grain via Dust Sampling: Review, Recent Advances and the Way Forward: The Contribution of the MycoKey Project.

Authors:  Biancamaria Ciasca; Sarah De Saeger; Marthe De Boevre; Mareike Reichel; Michelangelo Pascale; Antonio F Logrieco; Veronica M T Lattanzio
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Potential economic losses to the US corn industry from aflatoxin contamination.

Authors:  Nicole J Mitchell; Erin Bowers; Charles Hurburgh; Felicia Wu
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2016-02-15

4.  Comparison of manual and automatic sampling for monitoring ochratoxin A in barley grain.

Authors:  M G Andersson; E V Reiter; P-A Lindqvist; E Razzazi-Fazeli; P Häggblom
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2011-06-01

5.  Evaluation of the Impact of Skewness, Clustering, and Probe Sampling Plan on Aflatoxin Detection in Corn.

Authors:  Xianbin Cheng; Matthew J Stasiewicz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.302

6.  Optimization of the Aflatoxin Monitoring Costs along the Maize Supply Chain.

Authors:  M Focker; H J van der Fels-Klerx; A G J M Oude Lansink
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Enzymatic degradation is an effective means to reduce aflatoxin contamination in maize.

Authors:  Monica A Schmidt; Yizhou Mao; Joseph Opoku; Hillary L Mehl
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.563

8.  Comparison of the efficiency between two sampling plans for aflatoxins analysis in maize.

Authors:  Adriano Olnei Mallmann; Alexandro Marchioro; Maurício Schneider Oliveira; Ricardo Hummes Rauber; Paulo Dilkin; Carlos Augusto Mallmann
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.476

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.