Literature DB >> 12966691

How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers' perspective.

Agneta Larsson1, Gunvor Gard.   

Abstract

Employers in Sweden are by law responsible for planning and controlling the working environment situation in their companies and for ensuring that any need for rehabilitation is noted as soon as possible and that action is taken. This includes developing a plan for rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to describe employers' experiences of the work rehabilitation planning process at the workplace, and how it can be improved with a focus on quality and cost-effectiveness. Qualitative interviews were performed with 10 employers of employee/s that had participated in vocational rehabilitation at a rehabilitation center in the North of Sweden. The results showed that employers were interested in detecting work rehabilitation needs and in taking action early. Rehabilitation at the workplace could be improved by development of routines, improved work relations and work technique, and environment in-service training at the workplace. Prevention was perceived as a prerequisite for a good result of rehabilitation. Attention to social and geographic conditions is needed. Organizational and financial limitations exist.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966691     DOI: 10.1023/a:1024953218252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  15 in total

1.  Impact of case manager training on worksite accommodations in workers' compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders.

Authors:  Andrew E Lincoln; Michael Feuerstein; William S Shaw; Virginia I Miller
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed.

Authors:  Cecilia Nordqvist; Christina Holmqvist; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

3.  Content analysis: method, applications, and issues.

Authors:  B Downe-Wamboldt
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1992 Jul-Sep

4.  Motivating factors for return to work.

Authors:  G Gard; A C Sandberg
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  1998

5.  A randomized controlled trial of two strategies to implement active sick leave for patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Inger B Scheel; Kåre Birger Hagen; Jeph Herrin; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Factors associated with successful vocational rehabilitation in a Swedish rural area.

Authors:  S U Marnetoft; J Selander; A Bergroth; J Ekholm
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Functional activities and psychosocial factors in the rehabilitation of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  G Gard; K A Gille; B Grahn
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2000

8.  Conceptual basis of outcome measures.

Authors:  R A Keith
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Has increased focus on vocational rehabilitation led to an increase in young employees' return to work after work-related disorders?

Authors:  C Ahlgren; A Hammarström
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  The process of vocational rehabilitation for employed and unemployed people on sick-leave: employed people vs unemployed people in Stockholm compared with circumstances in rural Jämtland, Sweden.

Authors:  J Selander; S U Marnetoft; A Bergroth; J Ekholm
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1998-03
View more
  20 in total

1.  Return-to-work activities in a Chinese cultural context.

Authors:  Andy S K Cheng; Patrick Loisel; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

2.  A theoretical model of co-worker responses to work reintegration processes.

Authors:  Debra A Dunstan; Ellen Maceachen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

3.  Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme.

Authors:  Asa Tjulin; Elinor Edvardsson Stiwne; Kerstin Ekberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-12

4.  Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work.

Authors:  Asa Tjulin; Ellen Maceachen; Kerstin Ekberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

5.  Practices and Processes Used in the Return to Work of Injured New South Wales nurses: Are These Consistent With RTW Best Practice Principles?

Authors:  Carole James; Michelle Antoine; Maya Guest; Darren Rivett; Ashley Kable
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03

6.  Buddies in bad times? the role of co-workers after a work-related injury.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kosny; Marni Lifshen; Diana Pugliese; Gary Majesky; Desre Kramer; Ivan Steenstra; Sophie Soklaridis; Christine Carrasco
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

7.  Obstacles to and facilitators of return to work after work-disabling back pain: the workers' perspective.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Eve Laperrière
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-06

8.  Bearing the brunt: co-workers' experiences of work reintegration processes.

Authors:  Debra A Dunstan; Ellen MacEachen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

Review 9.  The impact of family and work-related social support on musculoskeletal injury outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khic-Houy Prang; Sharon Newnam; Janneke Berecki-Gisolf
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

10.  Content and concurrent validity of the motivation for change questionnaire.

Authors:  Birgitta Grahn; Gunvor Gard
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.