Literature DB >> 17690874

Non-target flanker effects on movement in a virtual action centred reference frame.

Sherilene M Carr1, James G Phillips, James W Meehan.   

Abstract

Visual selective attention is thought to underly inhibitory control during pointing movements. Accounts of inhibitory control during pointing movements make differential predictions about movement deviations towards or away from highly salient non-target flankers based on their potential cortical activation and subsequent inhibition: (1) Tipper et al. (Vis Cogn 4:1-38, 1997) "response vector model" predicts movements away from highly salient flankers; (2) Welsh and Elliott's (Q J Exp Psychol 57:1031-1057, 2004a and J Mot Behav 36:200-211, 2004b) "response activation model" predicts movements towards highly salient flankers early in the response, that is resolved by a race for inhibition. To eliminate the confounds of physical properties, such as obstacle avoidance and information cues of non-target objects, pointing was conducted in a virtual environment (graphical user interface). Participants were 14 skilled computer users who moved a computer cursor with a mouse to virtual targets. Analysis revealed non-target flankers significantly interfered with movement consistent with action centred selective attention, and reflecting a proximity-to-hand effect. Spatial analysis revealed evidence of highly salient flankers attracting movement, and less salient flankers repelling movement, supporting Welsh and Elliott's response activation model. These effects were achieved in a virtual 2D environment where interference caused by the physical properties of objects was less cogent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17690874     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1078-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Hand deviations toward distractors. Evidence for response competition.

Authors:  T N Welsh; D Elliott; D J Weeks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reaching affects saccade trajectories.

Authors:  S P Tipper; L A Howard; M A Paul
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of terminal action requirements on action-centered distractor effects.

Authors:  P L Weir; D J Weeks; T N Welsh; D Elliott; R Chua; E A Roy; J Lyons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; C Lortie; G C Baylis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching.

Authors:  Timothy Welsh; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-08

6.  Hand movements deviate toward distracters in the absence of response competition.

Authors:  Steve W C Chang; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2004-10

7.  Hand deviations away from visual cues: indirect evidence for inhibition.

Authors:  L A Howard; S P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sampling truncated distributions.

Authors:  T Nagylaki
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Characteristics of cursor trajectories controlled by the computer mouse.

Authors:  J G Phillips; T J Triggs
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Effects of response priming and inhibition on movement planning and execution.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Digby Elliot
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  2 in total

1.  Having several options does not increase the time it takes to make a movement to an adequate end point.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  The Gambler's Fallacy: A Basic Inhibitory Process?

Authors:  James Lyons; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.