Literature DB >> 29184465

How Should Imaging Direct/Orient Management of Rectal Cancer?

Jemma Bhoday1, Svetlana Balyasnikova1, Anita Wale1, Gina Brown1.   

Abstract

Modern rectal cancer management is dependent on preoperative staging, and radiological assessment is a crucial part of this process. Imaging must provide sufficient information to guide preoperative decision-making that is reliable and reproducible. Different methods have been used for local staging; however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown to be the most reliable tool for this purpose. MRI offers prognostic information about the patients and guides the decision between neoadjuvant treatment and total mesorectal excision alone. Also, not only the initial staging but also restaging by MRI can provide significant information regarding tumor response that is essential when considering alternative approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  local staging; magnetic resonance imaging; rectal cancer

Year:  2017        PMID: 29184465      PMCID: PMC5703668          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  102 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI and endorectal ultrasound in the restaging and response assessment of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  S Memon; A C Lynch; M Bressel; A G Wise; A G Heriot
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Interobserver agreement of radiologists assessing the response of rectal cancers to preoperative chemoradiation using the MRI tumour regression grading (mrTRG).

Authors:  M R S Siddiqui; K L Gormly; J Bhoday; S Balyansikova; N J Battersby; M Chand; S Rao; P Tekkis; A M Abulafi; G Brown
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Guiding post-treatment decisions in rectal cancer: mrTRG is a practical place to start.

Authors:  Nick J Battersby; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Brown; I R Daniels; C Richardson; P Revell; D Peppercorn; M Bourne
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Does rectal cancer height influence the oncological outcome?

Authors:  A Bhangu; S Rasheed; G Brown; D Tait; D Cunningham; P Tekkis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor for synchronous metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Beomseok Sohn; Joon-Seok Lim; Honsoul Kim; Sungmin Myoung; Junjeong Choi; Nam Kyu Kim; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Prognostic subdivision of ypT3 rectal tumours according to extension beyond the muscularis propria.

Authors:  S Merkel; K Weber; V Schellerer; J Göhl; R Fietkau; A Agaimy; W Hohenberger; P Hermanek
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?

Authors:  S Burton; G Brown; I R Daniels; A R Norman; B Mason; D Cunningham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Evidence-based surgery of rectal cancer].

Authors:  M Grade; H Flebbe; B M Ghadimi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Diagnostic performance of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the prognostic evaluation of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Lidi Ma; Shanshan Lian; Huimin Liu; Tiebao Meng; Weilong Zeng; Rui Zhong; Linchang Zhong; Chuanmiao Xie
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

Review 3.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in organ-preserving strategies for the management of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Cinthia D Ortega; Rodrigo O Perez
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-05-30

4.  Creation of a rectal cancer registry in Italy by the Advanced International Mini-Invasive Surgery (AIMS) academy clinical research network.

Authors:  Giulio M Mari; Pietro Achilli; Dario Maggioni; Jacopo Crippa; Andrea T M Costanzi; Mauro A Scotti; Vittorio Giardini; Mattia Garancini; Eugenio Cocozza; Giacomo Borroni; Ilaria Benzoni; Mario Martinotti; Luigi Totaro; Matteo Origi; Michele Mazzola; Giovanni Ferrari; Antonio Ziccarelli; Roberto Petri; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Giacomo Pugliese; Antonello Forgione; Raffaele Pugliese
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-10

Review 5.  Liquid biopsies to monitor and direct cancer treatment in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gianluca Mauri; Pietro Paolo Vitiello; Alberto Sogari; Giovanni Crisafulli; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Silvia Marsoni; Salvatore Siena; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 6.  Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when "Watch-and-Wait" is an option: a practical guide.

Authors:  Inês Santiago; Bernardete Rodrigues; Maria Barata; Nuno Figueiredo; Laura Fernandez; Antonio Galzerano; Oriol Parés; Celso Matos
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-08-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.