Literature DB >> 12592545

The use of poly-L-lactic acid in lumbar interbody cages: design and biomechanical evaluation in vitro.

Martijn van Dijk1, Theo H Smit, Maurice F Arnoe, Elisabeth H Burger, Paul I Wuisman.   

Abstract

Cage design and cage material may play a crucial role in the incidence of postoperative complications reported with current non-absorbable interbody cage devices. Bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid cage devices may have potential benefits. The purpose of this study was to determine the required strength of poly-L-lactic acid cages for use in experimental goat studies and to evaluate the mechanical properties of different cage designs in situ. The yield and ultimate strength of native goat motion segments (L1-L6) were determined; the yield strength was used as a design parameter for the cages. The mechanical behaviour of two types of poly-L-lactic acid cages, the influence of endplate perforation, differences between toothed and smooth cages, and the influence of cage filling were biomechanically tested and compared to native motion segments. Only axial compression until failure of the motion segments was performed. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to determine bone mineral content. The yield and ultimate strength of the native motion segments were 3.5 and 7.0 kN, respectively. Based on these data, flexible and stiff poly-L-lactic acid cages were designed with strengths of 3.5 and 7 kN, respectively. Poly-L-lactic acid cages, whether with or without bone graft and perforating the endplates, did not reduce the compressive strength of motion segments as compared to native segments. However, toothed titanium cages, with the same geometry, negatively influenced the segments' compressive strength, which effect was reduced using smooth titanium cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12592545     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0458-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  7 in total

1.  [Biodegradable cage. Osteointegration in spondylodesis of the sheep cervical spine].

Authors:  R Pflugmacher; T Eindorf; M Scholz; S Gumnior; C Krall; P Schleicher; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Porous biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cage design and fabrication using integrated global-local topology optimization with laser sintering.

Authors:  Heesuk Kang; Scott J Hollister; Frank La Marca; Paul Park; Chia-Ying Lin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Evolution of Design of Interbody Cages for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  Application of polylactides in spinal cages: studies in a goat model.

Authors:  T H Smit; M R Krijnen; M van Dijk; P I J M Wuisman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Spinal fusion using adipose stem cells seeded on a radiolucent cage filler: a feasibility study of a single surgical procedure in goats.

Authors:  Robert J Kroeze; Theo H Smit; Pieter P Vergroesen; Ruud A Bank; Reinout Stoop; Bert van Rietbergen; Barend J van Royen; Marco N Helder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Relation between radiological assessment and biomechanical stability of lumbar interbody fusion in a large animal model.

Authors:  R J Kroeze; A J van der Veen; B J van Royen; R A Bank; M N Helder; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Time-dependent failure of amorphous polylactides in static loading conditions.

Authors:  Tom A P Engels; Serge H M Söntjens; Theo H Smit; Leon E Govaert
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.