Literature DB >> 17143754

Application of polylactides in spinal cages: studies in a goat model.

T H Smit1, M R Krijnen, M van Dijk, P I J M Wuisman.   

Abstract

Spinal cages are currently made of non-resorbable materials, but they only have a temporary function: after fusion, resorption is desirable both from a biological and mechanical point of view. We studied different polylactides in stand-alone condition in a goat model. Cages were made of 100% poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) or 70/30 poly(L/DL-Lactic acid) (PLDLLA); titanium served as control. After six months, all titanium cages showed non-unions comparable to that observed in a clinical retrieval, thus showing validity of the goat model. PLLA cages maintained their mechanical integrity for six months, enough to allow fusion. After that, the material resorbed within 48 months without adverse tissue reactions. Bone formation was faster in PLDLLA cages, but these already failed within three months, thus losing their stabilising function: 50% ended in pseudo-arthrosis. Additional internal fixation provided enough stability for fusion (83%). Biocompatibility of both PLLA and PLDLLA was excellent. The long-term results show that PLLA cages can be used for stand-alone interbody fusion, and that PLLA is an improvement over titanium in terms of fusion rate. PLDLLA showed enhanced bone formation, but also earlier failure of the implant. Chances for spinal fusion were better with additional internal fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17143754     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-0597-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  29 in total

Review 1.  Musculoskeletal design in relation to body size.

Authors:  A A Biewener
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee; M L Lewis; L M Quinn; J M Persenaire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Spine update lumbar interbody cages.

Authors:  B K Weiner; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Biocompatibility study of as-polymerized poly(L-lactide) in rats using a cage implant system.

Authors:  J E Bergsma; F R Rozema; R R Bos; G Boering; W C de Bruijn; A J Pennings
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1995-02

5.  Bone histomorphometric evaluation of a clinically fused titanium tumour cage in a child.

Authors:  M van Dijk; Th H Smit; E H Burger; P I M J Wuisman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the effects of PLA microparticle crystallinity on cellular response.

Authors:  Danielle L Biggs; Corinne S Lengsfeld; Brooks M Hybertson; Ka-yun Ng; Mark C Manning; Theodore W Randolph
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices.

Authors:  M Kanayama; B W Cunningham; C J Haggerty; K Abumi; K Kaneda; P C McAfee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  The use of poly-L-lactic acid in lumbar interbody cages: design and biomechanical evaluation in vitro.

Authors:  Martijn van Dijk; Theo H Smit; Maurice F Arnoe; Elisabeth H Burger; Paul I Wuisman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Self-reinforced absorbable screws in the fixation of displaced ankle fractures: a prospective clinical study of 152 patients.

Authors:  E K Partio; O Böstman; E Hirvensalo; S Vainionpää; K Vihtonen; H Pätiälä; P Törmälä; P Rokkanen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  6 in total

1.  Porous biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cage design and fabrication using integrated global-local topology optimization with laser sintering.

Authors:  Heesuk Kang; Scott J Hollister; Frank La Marca; Paul Park; Chia-Ying Lin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The use of BoneWelding® technology in spinal surgery: an experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  Dorothee Heidenreich; Jens D Langhoff; Katja Nuss; Katharina Kluge; Käthi Kämpf; Katalin Zlinsky; Monika Hilbe; Jörg Mayer; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using non resorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices. Clinical outcome at a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Timothy U Jiya; T Smit; B J van Royen; M Mullender
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Are Medical Grade Bioabsorbable Polymers a Viable Material for Fused Filament Fabrication?

Authors:  Jaclyn Schachtner; Michael Frohbergh; Noreen Hickok; Steven Kurtz
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Time-dependent failure in load-bearing polymers: a potential hazard in structural applications of polylactides.

Authors:  T H Smit; T A P Engels; S H M Söntjens; L E Govaert
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Adipose stem cells for intervertebral disc regeneration: current status and concepts for the future.

Authors:  R J W Hoogendoorn; Z F Lu; R J Kroeze; R A Bank; P I Wuisman; M N Helder
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-02-24       Impact factor: 5.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.