Literature DB >> 12591037

Endoscopic, deep mural implantation of Enteryx for the treatment of GERD: 6-month follow-up of a multicenter trial.

David A Johnson1, Robert Ganz, James Aisenberg, Lawrence B Cohen, Jacques Deviere, T Raymond Foley, Gregory B Haber, Jeffrey H Peters, Glen A Lehman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic implantation of Enteryx, a biocompatible, non-biodegradable liquid polymer for the treatment of GERD.
METHODS: Eighty-five patients with heartburn symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were enrolled. Inclusion requirements were HRQL score < or = 11 on PPI and > or = 20 off PPI, and 24-hour PH probe with > or = 5% total time at PH < or = 4. Patients with a hiatus hernia > 3 cm, grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, or esophageal motility disorder were excluded. Using a 4-mm needle tipped catheter during standard endoscopy, implants were made in 3-4 quadrants deep into the wall of the cardia. Use of PPI medications, pH-metry, manometry, GERD symptoms, and patient quality of life were assessed over a 6-month follow-up period.
RESULTS: At 6 months, PPI use was eliminated in 74% and reduced by > 50% in 10% of patients. The median HRQL score improved from 24.0 pre-implant (baseline off PPIs) to 4.0 at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean total esophageal acid exposure time was 9.5% pretherapy and 6.7% at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean LES length increased from 2.0 cm at baseline to 3.0 cm posttherapy (p = 0.003). There were no clinically serious adverse events. Transient mild-to-moderate chest pain commonly occurred after implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic implantation of Enteryx is a safe and effective therapy for eliminating or decreasing the need for PPI medications, improving GERD symptoms and patient quality of life, and decreasing esophageal acid exposure among patients suffering from GERD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12591037     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  12 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: Important considerations for the older patients.

Authors:  Maxwell M Chait
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-12-16

Review 2.  Endoluminal treatment of GERD--role in contemporary clinical practice.

Authors:  John K DiBaise; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-08-04

3.  Outcomes of endoluminal gastric plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Daniel C DeMarco; Robert D Anderson
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-10

Review 4.  Endoscopic treatment modalities for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R E Lutfi; A Torquati; W O Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Stretta procedure in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: first report from Asia.

Authors:  Kazuhide Higuchi; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Hirotoshi Okazaki; Masahiko Tabuchi; Natsuhiko Kameda; Kaori Kadouchi; Hirohisa Machida; Tetsuya Tanigawa; Masatsugu Shiba; Toshio Watanabe; Kazunari Tominaga; Nobuhide Oshitani; Tetsuo Arakawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Endoscopic implantation of polymethylmethacrylate augments the gastroesophageal antireflux barrier: a short-term study in a porcine model.

Authors:  C P F Freitag; C R P Kruel; M E S Duarte; P R E Sanches; P R O Thomé; F Fornari; D Driemeier; F Teixeira; R O Mollerke; S M Callegari-Jacques; S G S Barros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Endoluminal fundoplication by a transoral device for the treatment of GERD: A feasibility study.

Authors:  G B Cadière; A Rajan; O Germay; J Himpens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  [Endoscopic therapy methods for gastroesophageal reflux].

Authors:  B Schumacher; H Neuhaus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Long-term retention of endoscopically placed hydrogel prostheses at the lower esophageal sphincter in pigs.

Authors:  D W Easter; M Yurek; G Johnson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Do endoscopic antireflux procedures fit in the current treatment paradigm of gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Kumar Krishnan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.