Literature DB >> 14752644

Long-term retention of endoscopically placed hydrogel prostheses at the lower esophageal sphincter in pigs.

D W Easter1, M Yurek, G Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using flexible endoscopic methods, hydrogel prostheses can be safely placed, retained for long periods of time, and removed from the esophageal submucosa of pigs. This new technique may have future applications in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in selected situations.
METHODS: In a controlled, prospective trial, farm pigs ( n = 28) or Sinclair mini-swine ( n = 18) underwent sequential placements of 2-13 pliable, radio-opaque hydrogel prostheses into the submucosa of the esophagus during a single endoscopy session. A novel endoscope-overtube device was used. Followup endoscopy and/or fluoroscopy sessions were video-recorded at 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, and yearly intervals. The endoscopic removal of hydrogels was tested in vivo. Necropsy specimens were inspected for signs of chronic inflammation.
RESULTS: Overall, 98% of delivery attempts were successful (288/293). Only three hydrogels were lost after 6 weeks. Short-term animals ( n = 36) retained 88% of hydrogels for periods up to 6 months. Intact hydrogels ( n = 12) were easily removed from four animals at endoscopy. Long-term subjects had two or three hydrogels per animal, using either a beveled-needle device (six pigs) or a trocar design (four pigs). Trocar design: nine of nine prostheses retained at 3 years (100%). Needle design: nine of 10 prostheses retained at 3 years (90%). No significant adverse event occurred. Growth curves were similar between groups. All hydrogels remained pliable to gross inspection upon in vivo removal or necropsy. Pathology showed minimal fibrosis and no chronic inflammation.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel endoscopic overtube device allows for the successful delivery of multiple hydrogel prostheses with acceptable safety and long term retention rates. These hydrogel prostheses can also be easily removed from the submucosal space of the esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752644     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8924-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Transoral, flexible endoscopic suturing for treatment of GERD: a multicenter trial.

Authors:  C J Filipi; G A Lehman; R I Rothstein; I Raijman; G V Stiegmann; J P Waring; J G Hunter; C J Gostout; S A Edmundowicz; D P Dunne; P A Watson; D A Cornet
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic placement of collagen at the lower esophageal sphincter to inhibit gastroesophageal reflux: a pilot study of 10 medically intractable patients.

Authors:  K W O'Connor; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Histopathologic appearance of arterial occlusions with hydrogel and polyvinyl alcohol embolic material in domestic swine.

Authors:  D P Link; J D Strandberg; R Virmani; K Blashka; F Mourtada; M A Samphilipo
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  A new intraluminal antigastroesophageal reflux procedure in baboons.

Authors:  R J Mason; C J Filipi; T R DeMeester; J H Peters; R J Lund; A W Flake; R A Hinder; T C Smyrk; C G Bremner; S Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Prevalence of symptoms suggestive of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in an adult population.

Authors:  J Isolauri; P Laippala
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.709

6.  An experimental endoscopic technique for reversing gastroesophageal reflux in dogs by injecting inert material in the distal esophagus.

Authors:  K W O'Connor; S A Madison; D J Smith; R C Ransburg; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: 6 and 12 month follow-up of the U.S. open label trial.

Authors:  George Triadafilopoulos; John K DiBaise; Timothy T Nostrant; Neil H Stollman; Paul K Anderson; M Michael Wolfe; Richard I Rothstein; John M Wo; Douglas A Corley; Marco G Patti; Louis V Antignano; John S Goff; Steven A Edmundowicz; Donald O Castell; John C Rabine; Michael S Kim; David S Utley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Endoscopic valvuloplasty for GERD.

Authors:  T Martinez-Serna; R E Davis; R Mason; G Perdikis; C J Filipi; G Lehman; J Nigro; P Watson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Endoscopic prosthesis augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter in swine.

Authors:  D W Easter; M Yurek; H Summers; G Johnson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Experimental renal embolization: preliminary results with polyacrylonitrile-based multiblock copolymers.

Authors:  W Z Gu; D P Link; H Tesluk; K Blashka
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.