Literature DB >> 16622087

Agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists on clinical management decisions for patients with glaucoma.

M J Banes1, L E Culham, C Bunce, W Xing, A Viswanathan, D Garway-Heath.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although optometrists have become an accepted part of the team in many hospital glaucoma clinics, their decision making ability has not been assessed formally. This study aims to document the accuracy and safety of clinical work undertaken by optometrists in the hospital setting by investigating their management decisions on follow up of patients with glaucoma.
METHODS: Four optometrists and three medical clinicians examined 50 patients each. Clinical findings were recorded as usual in the hospital records but management decisions were documented separately on a specially designed data collection form. Subsequently, the patient records and clinical findings were reviewed retrospectively and independently by two consultant ophthalmologists, who were masked to the management decisions of the optometrists and medical clinicians. The consultants' management decisions were then compared with those made by the optometrists and medical clinicians. Percentage agreements were computed together with kappa (kappa), or weighted kappa, statistics where appropriate.
RESULTS: Agreement between consultants and optometrists was 55% (kappa = 0.33) for evaluation of visual field status, 79% (kappa = 0.67) for medical management, 72-98% for other aspects of patient management, and 78% (weighted kappa = 0.35) for scheduling of next clinic appointment. Very similar levels of agreement were found between consultants and medical clinicians.
CONCLUSION: Agreement between optometrists and consultants, in glaucoma clinical decision making, was at least as good as that between medical clinicians and consultants. Within an appropriate environment, optometrists can safely work as part of the hospital glaucoma team in outpatient clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16622087      PMCID: PMC1857057          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.082388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  19 in total

1.  Nurse prescribing in glaucoma.

Authors:  Z K Johnson; P G Griffiths; M K Birch
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Initial management of ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma: an evaluation of the royal college of ophthalmologists' guidelines.

Authors:  Y F Choong; N Devarajan; A Pickering; S Pickering; M W Austin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The projected increase in glaucoma due to an ageing population.

Authors:  Maurice W Tuck; Ronald Pitts Crick
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic.

Authors:  R W Bell; C O'Brien
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study--validity of measurements and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  S F Gray; I C Spencer; P G Spry; S T Brookes; I A Baker; T J Peters; J M Sparrow; D L Easty
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1997-12

6.  Shared care for glaucoma.

Authors:  R Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial.

Authors:  J Theodossiades; I Murdoch; S Cousens
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: study design.

Authors:  I C Spencer; P G Spry; S F Gray; I A Baker; M J Menage; D L Easty; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma.

Authors:  L S Abrams; I U Scott; G L Spaeth; H A Quigley; R Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Glaucoma screening.

Authors:  R P Wormald; A Rauf
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  18 in total

1.  Provision of eye care: commissioning change.

Authors:  Tarun Sharma; Richard Wormald; Wendy Franks
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Patterns of adherence to NICE glaucoma guidance in two different service delivery models.

Authors:  A Chawla; I Patel; C Yuen; C Fenerty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Agreement between specially trained and accredited optometrists and glaucoma specialist consultant ophthalmologists in their management of glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J R Marks; A K Harding; R A Harper; E Williams; S Haque; A F Spencer; C Fenerty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Visual field progression in Malay patients with primary glaucoma: survival analysis and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Wan Masri Wan-Ezatul-Arisha; Shi Jin Diana-Toh; Abdul Satar Huwaina; Majdi Yaakob Najib; Yaakub Azhany; Bachok Norsa'adah; Ahmad Tajudin Liza-Sharmini
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The accuracy of accredited glaucoma optometrists in the diagnosis and treatment recommendation for glaucoma.

Authors:  A Azuara-Blanco; J Burr; R Thomas; G Maclennan; S McPherson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Service innovation in glaucoma management: using a Web-based electronic patient record to facilitate virtual specialist supervision of a shared care glaucoma programme.

Authors:  Heathcote R Wright; Jeremy P Diamond
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Effectiveness of Community versus Hospital Eye Service follow-up for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with quiescent disease (ECHoES): a virtual non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Barnaby C Reeves; Lauren J Scott; Jodi Taylor; Simon P Harding; Tunde Peto; Alyson Muldrew; Ruth E Hogg; Sarah Wordsworth; Nicola Mills; Dermot O'Reilly; Chris A Rogers; Usha Chakravarthy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Cost-effectiveness of community versus hospital eye service follow-up for patients with quiescent treated age-related macular degeneration alongside the ECHoES randomised trial.

Authors:  M Violato; H Dakin; U Chakravarthy; B C Reeves; T Peto; R E Hogg; S P Harding; L J Scott; J Taylor; H Cappel-Porter; N Mills; D O'Reilly; C A Rogers; S Wordsworth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Collaborative care of non-urgent macular disease: a study of inter-optometric referrals.

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  The design and implementation of a study to investigate the effectiveness of community vs hospital eye service follow-up for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with quiescent disease.

Authors:  J Taylor; L J Scott; C A Rogers; A Muldrew; D O'Reilly; S Wordsworth; N Mills; R Hogg; M Violato; S P Harding; T Peto; D Townsend; U Chakravarthy; B C Reeves
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.