Literature DB >> 12574444

Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects.

Anne-Sophie Augurelle1, Allan M Smith, Thierry Lejeune, Jean-Louis Thonnard.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that grip and load forces are modulated simultaneously during manipulation of a hand-held object. This close temporal coupling suggested that both forces are controlled by an internal model within the CNS that predicts the changes in tangential force on the fingers. The objective of the present study was to examine how the internal model would compensate for the loss of cutaneous sensation through local anesthesia of the index and thumb. Ten healthy adult subjects (5 men and 5 women aged 20-57 yr) were asked to grasp, lift, and hold stationary, a 250 g object for 20 s. Next, the subjects were asked to perform vertical oscillatory movements over a distance of 20 cm at a rate of 1.0 Hz for 30 s. Eleven trials were performed with intact sensation, and 11 trials after a local ring-block anesthesia of the index and thumb with bupivacain (5 mg/ml). During static holding, loss of cutaneous sensation produced a significant increase in the safety margin. However, the grip force declined significantly over the 20-s static hold period. During oscillatory arm movements, grip and load forces were continuously modulated together in a predictive manner as suggested by Flanagan and Wing. Again, the grip force declined over the 30-s movement, and 7/10 subjects dropped the object at least once. With intact sensation, the object was never dropped; but with the fingers anesthetized, it was dropped on 36% of the trials, and a significant slip occurred on a further 12%. The mean correlation between the grip and load forces for all subjects deteriorated from 0.71 with intact sensation to 0.48 after digital anesthesia. However, a cross-correlation calculated between the grip and load forces indicated that the phase lag was approximately zero both with and without digital anesthesia. Taken together, the data from the present study suggest that cutaneous afferents are required for setting and maintaining the background level of the grip force in addition to their phasic slip-detection function and their role in adapting the grip force/load force ratio to the friction on initial contact with an object. Finally, at a more theoretical level, they correct and maintain an internal model of the physical properties of hand-held objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12574444     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00249.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  92 in total

1.  Ipsilateral finger representations in the sensorimotor cortex are driven by active movement processes, not passive sensory input.

Authors:  Eva Berlot; George Prichard; Jill O'Reilly; Naveed Ejaz; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Production of finely graded forces in humans: effects of simulated weightlessness by water immersion.

Authors:  M Dalecki; T Dräger; A Mierau; O Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Abnormal capacity for grip force control in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain.

Authors:  Noritaka Kawashima; Masaki O Abe; Tsutomu Iwaya; Nobuhiko Haga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Genetically identified spinal interneurons integrating tactile afferents for motor control.

Authors:  Tuan V Bui; Nicolas Stifani; Izabela Panek; Carl Farah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex related to tactile exploration.

Authors:  Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Allan M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Correlation of fingertip shear force direction with somatosensory cortical activity in monkey.

Authors:  Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Jean-Sébastien Langlais; Allan M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Matthew Schiefer; Daniel Tan; Steven M Sidek; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

Authors:  Mor Farajian; Raz Leib; Hanna Kossowsky; Tomer Zaidenberg; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Effect of human grip strategy on force control in precision tasks.

Authors:  Michelle N McDonnell; Michael C Ridding; Stanley C Flavel; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grip force control of predictable external loads.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; H Blankenfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.