Literature DB >> 30517048

Ipsilateral finger representations in the sensorimotor cortex are driven by active movement processes, not passive sensory input.

Eva Berlot1, George Prichard2, Jill O'Reilly3,4, Naveed Ejaz1, Jörn Diedrichsen1,5.   

Abstract

Hand and finger movements are mostly controlled through crossed corticospinal projections from the contralateral hemisphere. During unimanual movements, activity in the contralateral hemisphere is increased while the ipsilateral hemisphere is suppressed below resting baseline. Despite this suppression, unimanual movements can be decoded from ipsilateral activity alone. This indicates that ipsilateral activity patterns represent parameters of ongoing movement, but the origin and functional relevance of these representations is unclear. In this study, we asked whether ipsilateral representations are caused by active movement or whether they are driven by sensory input. Participants alternated between performing single finger presses and having fingers passively stimulated while we recorded brain activity using high-field (7T) functional imaging. We contrasted active and passive finger representations in sensorimotor areas of ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres. Finger representations in the contralateral hemisphere were equally strong under passive and active conditions, highlighting the importance of sensory information in feedback control. In contrast, ipsilateral finger representations in the sensorimotor cortex were stronger during active presses. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of finger representations differed between hemispheres: the contralateral hemisphere showed the strongest finger representations in Brodmann areas 3a and 3b, whereas the ipsilateral hemisphere exhibited stronger representations in premotor and parietal areas. Altogether, our results suggest that finger representations in the two hemispheres have different origins: contralateral representations are driven by both active movement and sensory stimulation, whereas ipsilateral representations are mainly engaged during active movement. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Movements of the human body are mostly controlled by contralateral cortical regions. The function of ipsilateral activity during movements remains elusive. Using high-field neuroimaging, we investigated how human contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres represent active and passive finger presses. We found that representations in contralateral sensorimotor cortex are equally strong during both conditions. Ipsilateral representations were mostly present during active movement, suggesting that sensorimotor areas do not receive direct sensory input from the ipsilateral hand.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; finger movements; ipsilateral; motor; sensory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30517048      PMCID: PMC6397402          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00439.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; Donald J Crammond; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of transcallosal volleys on pyramidal tract cell activity of cat.

Authors:  H ASANUMA; O OKUDA
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; John F Kalaska
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke.

Authors:  Christian Gerloff; Khalaf Bushara; Alexandra Sailer; Eric M Wassermann; Robert Chen; Takahiro Matsuoka; Daniel Waldvogel; George F Wittenberg; Kenji Ishii; Leonardo G Cohen; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Activation of distinct motor cortex regions during ipsilateral and contralateral finger movements.

Authors:  S C Cramer; S P Finklestein; J D Schaechter; G Bush; B R Rosen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities.

Authors:  R Chen; C Gerloff; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Hand use predicts the structure of representations in sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Naveed Ejaz; Masashi Hamada; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Separable systems for recovery of finger strength and control after stroke.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Naveed Ejaz; Benjamin Hertler; Meret Branscheidt; Mario Widmer; Andreia V Faria; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Nathan Kim; Pablo A Celnik; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas R Luft; John W Krakauer; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Pattern component modeling: A flexible approach for understanding the representational structure of brain activity patterns.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Atsushi Yokoi; Spencer A Arbuckle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Cortical folding patterns and predicting cytoarchitecture.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; Niranjini Rajendran; Evelina Busa; Jean Augustinack; Oliver Hinds; B T Thomas Yeo; Hartmut Mohlberg; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  15 in total

1.  Maintained Representations of the Ipsilateral and Contralateral Limbs during Bimanual Control in Primary Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Kevin P Cross; Ethan A Heming; Douglas J Cook; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The Cortical Physiology of Ipsilateral Limb Movements.

Authors:  David T Bundy; Eric C Leuthardt
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Motor cortex signals for each arm are mixed across hemispheres and neurons yet partitioned within the population response.

Authors:  Katherine Cora Ames; Mark M Churchland
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Baseline hippocampal beta band power is lower in the presence of movement uncertainty.

Authors:  Zachary D Gilbert; Roberto Martin Del Campo-Vera; Austin M Tang; Kuang-Hsuan Chen; Rinu Sebastian; Arthur Shao; Emiliano Tabarsi; Ryan S Chung; Andrea Leonor; Shivani Sundaram; Christi Heck; George Nune; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Distinct representation of ipsilateral hand movements in sensorimotor areas.

Authors:  Mark L C M Bruurmijn; Mathijs Raemaekers; Mariana P Branco; Nick F Ramsey; Mariska J Vansteensel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 3.698

6.  Obtaining and maintaining cortical hand representation as evidenced from acquired and congenital handlessness.

Authors:  Daan B Wesselink; Fiona Mz van den Heiligenberg; Naveed Ejaz; Harriet Dempsey-Jones; Lucilla Cardinali; Aurelie Tarall-Jozwiak; Jörn Diedrichsen; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Handedness Matters for Motor Control But Not for Prediction.

Authors:  James Mathew; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Pierre-Michel Bernier; Frederic R Danion
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-06

8.  Spatially and Temporally Distinct Encoding of Muscle and Kinematic Information in Rostral and Caudal Primary Motor Cortex.

Authors:  James Kolasinski; Diana C Dima; David M A Mehler; Alice Stephenson; Sara Valadan; Slawomir Kusmia; Holly E Rossiter
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-04-04

9.  Sensory stimulation enhances phantom limb perception and movement decoding.

Authors:  Luke E Osborn; Keqin Ding; Mark A Hays; Rohit Bose; Mark M Iskarous; Andrei Dragomir; Zied Tayeb; György M Lévay; Christopher L Hunt; Gordon Cheng; Robert S Armiger; Anastasios Bezerianos; Matthew S Fifer; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Organized Toe Maps in Extreme Foot Users.

Authors:  Harriet Dempsey-Jones; Daan B Wesselink; Jason Friedman; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.