Literature DB >> 12564273

Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain.

Fraser Birrell1, Cara Afzal, Elizabeth Nahit, Mark Lunt, Gary J Macfarlane, Cyrus Cooper, Peter R Croft, Gillian Hosie, Alan J Silman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the factors associated with need for total hip replacement should ideally be based on prospective investigation of new attenders in primary care. AIM: To determine the incidence of listing for total hip replacement, and its predictors, among attenders in primary care with a new episode of hip pain. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective multicentre cohort study.
SETTING: One hundred and ninety-five patients (mean age = 63 years, 68% female) with new episode of hip pain, attending primary care between November 1994 and October 1997. At the first visit, patients were evaluated for indices of pain and disability, range of hip movement, and radiographic changes of osteoarthritis.
METHOD: General practitioner participants were recruited from the membership of the Primary Care Rheumatology Society to recruit all consecutive attenders with a new episode of hip pain. Annual follow-up was carried out to determine which patients were being 'put on a waiting list' for total hip replacement.
RESULTS: Seven per cent of patients were put on a waiting list for total hip replacement within 12 months and 23% of patients within four years. At presentation, pain duration, pain severity, (including the need to use a stick) and restriction of internal rotation were the major clinical predictors of being put on a waiting list. Radiographic predictors of osteoarthritis performed similarly to the clinical measures. A simple scoring system based on both radiographic severity and two of the clinical measures was derived that identified groups at high likelihood of being put on a waiting list (sensitivity = 76%) with a low false-positive rate (specificity = 95%).
CONCLUSION: New primary care attenders with pain are frequently accepted for total hip replacement soon after their first attendance--a decision that can be predicted by simple clinical measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12564273      PMCID: PMC1314488     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  13 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Radiographic change is common in new presenters in primary care with hip pain. PCR Hip Study Group.

Authors:  F Birrell; P Croft; C Cooper; G Hosie; G J Macfarlane; A Silman
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  A comparison of test statistics for assessing the effects of concomitant variables in survival analysis.

Authors:  K L Lee; F E Harrell; H D Tolley; R A Rosati
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Case definition of hip osteoarthritis in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  P Croft; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Health impact of pain in the hip region with and without radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis: a study of new attenders to primary care. The PCR Hip Study Group.

Authors:  F Birrell; P Croft; C Cooper; G Hosie; G Macfarlane; A Silman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Predicting radiographic hip osteoarthritis from range of movement.

Authors:  F Birrell; P Croft; C Cooper; G Hosie; G Macfarlane; A Silman
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Interobserver reliability in measuring flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation of the hip using a plurimeter.

Authors:  P R Croft; E S Nahit; G J Macfarlane; A J Silman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  The MODEL project: a scoring system to manage demand for cataract and joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  T H Dent; S L Cunningham; W E Hook; R J Morris; N C Sylvester
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Predictors of the need for total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  C Vinciguerra; A Gueguen; M Revel; J N Heuleu; B Amor; M Dougados
Journal:  Rev Rhum Engl Ed       Date:  1995-10

10.  Severity of radiographic findings in hip osteoarthritis associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K M Fox; M C Hochberg; C S Resnik; J E Kenzora; J R Hebel; S I Zimmerman; J Hudson; J Magaziner
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.666

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

Authors:  W Zhang; M Doherty; N Arden; B Bannwarth; J Bijlsma; K-P Gunther; H J Hauselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; K Jordan; P Kaklamanis; B Leeb; M Lequesne; S Lohmander; B Mazieres; E Martin-Mola; K Pavelka; A Pendleton; L Punzi; B Swoboda; R Varatojo; G Verbruggen; I Zimmermann-Gorska; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian D Mallen; George Peat; Elaine Thomas; Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  [Determining the indication for primary total hip and knee replacement. Results of external quality assurance of over 270,000 primary total hip and knee replacements].

Authors:  P Schräder; O Boy; W Schleiz; R Dienst; C Reinert; V Sänger; H-H Schauwecker; W Siebert; H-P Scharf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Population survey comparing older adults with hip versus knee pain in primary care.

Authors:  Louise Linsell; Jill Dawson; Krina Zondervan; Peter Rose; Andrew Carr; Tony Randall; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Factors associated with change in pain and disability over time: a community-based prospective observational study of hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Tim J Peters; Caroline Sanders; Paul Dieppe; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Role of radiography in predicting progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Max Reijman; J M W Hazes; H A P Pols; R M D Bernsen; B W Koes; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-13

7.  Clinical appropriateness and not race predicted referral for joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dennis C Ang; Golda James; Timothy E Stump
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-12-15

8.  Rate of cartilage loss at two years predicts subsequent total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  F M Cicuttini; G Jones; A Forbes; A E Wluka
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Characteristics of People with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Deemed Not Yet Ready for Total Joint Arthroplasty at Triage.

Authors:  Norma J MacIntyre; Jenna Johnson; Nicole MacDonald; Lauren Pontarini; Kaitlyn Ross; Gorana Zubic; Sampa Samanta Majumdar
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

10.  Characteristics associated with joint replacement in early symptomatic knee or hip osteoarthritis: 6-year results from a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK).

Authors:  Alex N Bastick; Jurgen Damen; Rintje Agricola; Reinoud W Brouwer; Patrick Je Bindels; Sita Ma Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.