Literature DB >> 18806998

[Determining the indication for primary total hip and knee replacement. Results of external quality assurance of over 270,000 primary total hip and knee replacements].

P Schräder1, O Boy, W Schleiz, R Dienst, C Reinert, V Sänger, H-H Schauwecker, W Siebert, H-P Scharf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The German mandatory quality assurance programme collects data from all primary total hip and knee replacements. The quality of the indication is measured by clinical and radiological criteria. The results were analysed in terms of differences in establishing the indication subject to patient and hospital characteristics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on more than 270,000 primary total hip and knee replacements that were operated in 2006 in Germany were analysed concerning differences in the quality of the indication subject to age, gender, hospital volume and density of population and hospitals (metropolitan vs rural areas). The statistical analysis was done by exact Fisher's test.
RESULTS: The quality of the indication was statistically significantly better in men, patients 60 and older, in rural areas and in high volume hospitals (50 and more joint replacements per year). DISCUSSION: Data of this mandatory German quality assurance programme are useful to describe differences in medical care. The results are valid and complete. An exact analysis of the reasons for these differences is difficult though. Data focus is on quality assurance and represent only in-hospital results.
CONCLUSION: Further analyses are necessary to ascertain whether the differences in quality of care are deficits or only variances in medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18806998     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1341-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  20 in total

1.  Use of longitudinal data analysis in the determination of a global score for total hip replacement indication in osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  J P Nakache; A Gueguen; J Maillefert; M Dougados
Journal:  J Epidemiol Biostat       Date:  2001

2.  Validity of American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosing hip osteoarthritis in primary care research.

Authors:  S Bierma-Zeinstra; A Bohnen; A Ginai; A Prins; J Verhaar
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Arthroscopy before arthroplasty: a con or a comfort?

Authors:  Robert E Booth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  [Experience in orthopaedic surgery with minimum provider volumes].

Authors:  P Schräder; V Ewerbeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  [Is it possible to calculate minimum provider volumes for total knee replacement using routine data? Results of a threshold value analysis of German quality assurance data for inpatient treatment].

Authors:  P Schräder; U Grouven; R Bender
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview.

Authors:  D C Hadorn; A C Holmes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-11

8.  Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences.

Authors:  G A Hawker; J G Wright; P C Coyte; J I Williams; B Harvey; R Glazier; A Wilkins; E M Badley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Scoring prevalence and severity in gonarthritis: the suitability of the Kellgren & Lawrence scale.

Authors:  S Kessler; K P Guenther; W Puhl
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain.

Authors:  Fraser Birrell; Cara Afzal; Elizabeth Nahit; Mark Lunt; Gary J Macfarlane; Cyrus Cooper; Peter R Croft; Gillian Hosie; Alan J Silman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Minimal provider volume in total knee replacement : an analysis of the external quality assurance program of North Rhine-Westphalia (QS-NRW)].

Authors:  T Kostuj; U Schulze-Raestrup; M Noack; K Buckup; R Smektala
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Course of pain after total hip arthroplasty within a standardized pain management concept: a prospective study examining influence, correlation, and outcome of postoperative pain on 103 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Felix Greimel; Gregor Dittrich; Timo Schwarz; Moritz Kaiser; Bernd Krieg; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Achim Benditz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  [Course of pain after operative orthopedic interventions: Characterization exemplified by total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  A Benditz; F Völlner; C Baier; J Götz; J Grifka; A Keshmiri
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Enhanced Recovery After Total Hip Replacement Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  YiBo Zhao; Baifeng Zhang; Yongzhi Wang; Jingwei Liu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-23

5.  Implementing fast-track in total hip arthroplasty: rapid mobilization with low need for pain medication and low pain values : Retrospective analysis of 102 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Julia Sabrina Götz; Franziska Leiss; Günther Maderbacher; Matthias Meyer; Jan Reinhard; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Felix Greimel
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 1.372

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.