Literature DB >> 12560782

Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections: results of a double-blind, randomized comparative phase III trial.

Joseph S Solomkin1, Albert E Yellin, Ori D Rotstein, Nicolas V Christou, E Patchen Dellinger, Jose M Tellado, Osvaldo Malafaia, Alvaro Fernandez, Kyuran A Choe, Alexandra Carides, Vilas Satishchandran, Hedy Teppler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical efficacy and safety of ertapenem, a novel beta-lactam agent with wide activity against common pathogens encountered in intraabdominal infection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Ertapenem has a pharmacokinetic profile and antimicrobial spectrum that support the potential for use as a once-a-day agent for the treatment of common mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. METHODS This prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of ertapenem with piperacillin/tazobactam as therapy following adequate surgical management of complicated intraabdominal infections.
RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-three patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat population, with 396 meeting all criteria for the evaluable population. Patients with a wide range of infections were enrolled; perforated or abscessed appendicitis was most common (approximately 60% in microbiologically evaluable population). A prospective, expert panel review was conducted to assess the adequacy of surgical source control in patients who were failures as a component of evaluability. For the modified intent-to-treat groups, 245 of 311 patients treated with ertapenem (79.3%) were cured, as were 232 of 304 (76.2) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. One hundred seventy-six of 203 microbiologically evaluable patients treated with ertapenem (86.7%) were cured, as were 157 of the 193 (81.2%) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the efficacy of ertapenem 1 g once a day was equivalent to piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 6 hours in the treatment of a range of intraabdominal infections. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated and had a similar safety and tolerability profile to piperacillin/tazobactam. A formal process for review of adequacy of source control was found to be of benefit. The results of this trial suggest that ertapenem may be a useful option that could eliminate the need for combination and/or multidosed antibiotic regimens for the empiric treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12560782      PMCID: PMC1522141          DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048551.32606.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  25 in total

1.  In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against clinical bacterial isolates from 11 North American medical centers.

Authors:  P C Fuchs; A L Barry; S D Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparative In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against 1,001 anaerobes isolated from human intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron; C Vreni Merriam; Y Warren; K L Tyrrell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against recent clinical bacteria collected in Europe and Australia.

Authors:  D M Livermore; M W Carter; S Bagel; B Wiedemann; F Baquero; E Loza; H P Endtz; N van Den Braak; C J Fernandes; L Fernandes; N Frimodt-Moller; L S Rasmussen; H Giamarellou; E Giamarellos-Bourboulis; V Jarlier; J Nguyen; C E Nord; M J Struelens; C Nonhoff; J Turnidge; J Bell; R Zbinden; S Pfister; L Mixson; D L Shungu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The bacteriology of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  B Lorber; R M Swenson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Antibiotic management of surgically treated gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. Comparison of gentamicin and clindamycin versus cefamandole versus cefoperazone.

Authors:  T V Berne; A W Yellin; M D Appleman; P N Heseltine
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Risk factors associated with intraabdominal infections: a prospective multicenter study. Peritonitis Study Group.

Authors:  H Wacha; T Hau; R Dittmer; C Ohmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Microbial synergy in experimental intra-abdominal abscess.

Authors:  A B Onderdonk; J G Bartlett; T Louie; N Sullivan-Seigler; S L Gorbach
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 9.  A review. Lessons from an animal model of intra-abdominal sepsis.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; A B Onderdonk; T Louie; D L Kasper; S L Gorbach
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1978-07

10.  Perforated and gangrenous appendicitis: an analysis of antibiotic failures.

Authors:  P N Heseltine; A E Yellin; M D Appleman; M A Gill; F C Chenella; J W Kern; T V Berne
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  39 in total

1.  [New antimicrobial drugs: an update].

Authors:  Heinz Burgmann
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2003

2.  Are enterococci playing a role in postoperative peritonitis in critically ill patients?

Authors:  P Seguin; C Brianchon; Y Launey; B Laviolle; N Nesseler; P-Y Donnio; Y Malledant
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Carlos A Ordoñez; Juan Carlos Puyana
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Efficacy and safety of ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections requiring surgical intervention.

Authors:  Arturo S Dela Pena; Walter Asperger; Ferdinand Köckerling; Raul Raz; Reinhold Kafka; Brian Warren; Malathi Shivaprakash; France Vrijens; Hilde Giezek; Mark J DiNubile; Christina Y Chan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  [Antimicrobial and antimycotic therapy of intra-abdominal infections].

Authors:  P Kujath; M Hoffmann; A Rodloff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Pharmacokinetics of ertapenem following intravenous and subcutaneous infusions in patients.

Authors:  Denis Frasca; Sandrine Marchand; Franck Petitpas; Claire Dahyot-Fizelier; William Couet; Olivier Mimoz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Anthony W Chow; Gerald A Evans; Avery B Nathens; Chad G Ball; Glen Hansen; Godfrey Km Harding; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

8.  Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam plus metronidazole compared with meropenem in adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Christopher Lucasti; Ellie Hershberger; Benjamin Miller; Sara Yankelev; Judith Steenbergen; Ian Friedland; Joseph Solomkin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

9. 

Authors:  J Solera; G Jarava
Journal:  Medicine (Madr)       Date:  2009-01-06

Review 10.  Current concepts in peritonitis.

Authors:  Mark A Malangoni
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.