Literature DB >> 11353638

In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against recent clinical bacteria collected in Europe and Australia.

D M Livermore1, M W Carter, S Bagel, B Wiedemann, F Baquero, E Loza, H P Endtz, N van Den Braak, C J Fernandes, L Fernandes, N Frimodt-Moller, L S Rasmussen, H Giamarellou, E Giamarellos-Bourboulis, V Jarlier, J Nguyen, C E Nord, M J Struelens, C Nonhoff, J Turnidge, J Bell, R Zbinden, S Pfister, L Mixson, D L Shungu.   

Abstract

Ertapenem (MK-0826, L-749,345) is a 1-beta-methyl carbapenem with a long serum half-life. Its in vitro activity was determined by broth microdilution against 3,478 bacteria from 12 centers in Europe and Australia, with imipenem, cefepime, ceftriaxone, and piperacillin-tazobactam used as comparators. Ertapenem was the most active agent tested against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, with MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited (MIC(90)s) of < or =1 microg/ml for all species. Ertapenem also was more active than imipenem against fastidious gram-negative bacteria and Moraxella spp.; on the other hand, ertapenem was slightly less active than imipenem against streptococci, methicillin-susceptible staphylococci, and anaerobes, but its MIC(90)s for these groups remained < or =0.5 microg/ml. Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were also much less susceptible to ertapenem than imipenem, and most Enterococcus faecalis strains were resistant. Ertapenem resistance, based on a provisional NCCLS MIC breakpoint of > or =16 microg/ml, was seen in only 3 of 1,611 strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae tested, all of them Enterobacter aerogenes. Resistance was also seen in 2 of 135 anaerobes, comprising 1 Bacteroides fragilis strain and 1 Clostridium difficile strain. Ertapenem breakpoints for streptococci have not been established, but an unofficial susceptibility breakpoint of < or =2 microg/ml was adopted for clinical trials to generate corresponding clinical response data for isolates for which MICs were as high as 2 microg/ml. Of 234 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains tested, 2 required ertapenem MICs of 2 microg/ml and one required an MIC of 4 microg/ml, among 67 non-Streptococcus pyogenes, non-Streptococcus pneumoniae streptococci, single isolates required ertapenem MICs of 2 and 16 microg/ml. These streptococci also had diminished susceptibilities to other beta-lactams, including imipenem as well as ertapenem. The Etest and disk diffusion gave susceptibility test results in good agreement with those of the broth microdilution method for ertapenem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353638      PMCID: PMC90558          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1860-1867.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  20 in total

1.  In-vitro antimicrobial activity of a carbapenem, MK-0826 (L-749,345) and provisional interpretive criteria for disc tests.

Authors:  P C Fuchs; A L Barry; S D Brown
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Carbapenems: the pinnacle of the beta-lactam antibiotics or room for improvement?

Authors:  J R Edwards; M J Betts
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Biochemical characterization of the metallo-beta-lactamase CcrA from Bacteroides fragilis TAL3636.

Authors:  Y Yang; B A Rasmussen; K Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cloning and sequencing of the class B beta-lactamase gene (ccrA) from Bacteroides fragilis TAL3636.

Authors:  B A Rasmussen; Y Gluzman; F P Tally
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  SHV-7, a novel cefotaxime-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase, identified in Escherichia coli isolates from hospitalized nursing home patients.

Authors:  P A Bradford; C Urban; A Jaiswal; N Mariano; B A Rasmussen; S J Projan; J J Rahal; K Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Resistance to antibiotics mediated by target alterations.

Authors:  B G Spratt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Carbapenemases: a problem in waiting?

Authors:  D M Livermore; N Woodford
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Comparative in-vitro activity of meropenem on clinical isolates from the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A King; C Boothman; I Phillips
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 9.  beta-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance.

Authors:  D M Livermore
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Imipenem- and meropenem-resistant mutants of Enterobacter cloacae and Proteus rettgeri lack porins.

Authors:  A Raimondi; A Traverso; H Nikaido
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  30 in total

1.  Role of beta-lactamases and porins in resistance to ertapenem and other beta-lactams in Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  George A Jacoby; Debra M Mills; Nancy Chow
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamic profile of ertapenem against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in a murine thigh model.

Authors:  Dana Maglio; Mary Anne Banevicius; Christina Sutherland; Chinedum Babalola; Charles H Nightingale; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Multicenter antimicrobial susceptibility survey of gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients with community-acquired infections in the People's Republic of China.

Authors:  Thomas K W Ling; Jianhui Xiong; Yunsong Yu; Ching Ching Lee; Huifen Ye; Peter M Hawkey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin against anaerobes studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Alan R Noel; Karen E Bowker; Alasdair P Macgowan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vitro activity of tomopenem (CS-023/RO4908463) against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  Kaori Tanaka; Hiroshige Mikamo; Kenichi Nakao; Taku Ichiishi; Takatsugu Goto; Yuka Yamagishi; Kunitomo Watanabe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Ertapenem pharmacokinetics and impact on intestinal microflora, in comparison to those of ceftriaxone, after multiple dosing in male and female volunteers.

Authors:  Mathias W R Pletz; Mareike Rau; Juergen Bulitta; Andres De Roux; Olaf Burkhardt; Guido Kruse; Michael Kurowski; Carl E Nord; Hartmut Lode
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 8.  Comparative review of the carbapenems.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Ryan Wiebe; Leanne Dilay; Kristjan Thomson; Ethan Rubinstein; Daryl J Hoban; Ayman M Noreddin; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: focus on ertapenem.

Authors:  Fausto de Lalla
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mao Mao An; Zui Zou; Hui Shen; Jun Dong Zhang; Meng Li Chen; Ping Liu; Rui Wang; Yuan Ying Jiang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.