OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate the readability and document complexity of currently available family history tools for the general public. METHODS: Three steps were undertaken to identify family history tools for evaluation: (a) Internet searches, (b) expert consultation, and (c) literature searches. Tools identified were assessed for readability using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) readability formula. The complexity of documents (i.e., forms collecting family history information) was assessed using the PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability formula. RESULTS: A total of 78 tools were identified, 47 of which met the criteria for inclusion. SMOG reading grade levels for multimedia-based tools ranged from 10.1 to 18.3, with an average score of 13.6. For print-based tools, SMOG ranged from 8.7 to 14.1, with an average score of 12.0. Document complexity ranged from very low complexity (level 1 proficiency) to high complexity (level 4 proficiency). CONCLUSION: The majority of tools are written at a reading grade level that is beyond the 8th grade average reading level in the United States. The lack of family history tools that are easy to read or use may compromise their potential effectiveness in identifying individuals at increased risk for chronic diseases in the general population.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate the readability and document complexity of currently available family history tools for the general public. METHODS: Three steps were undertaken to identify family history tools for evaluation: (a) Internet searches, (b) expert consultation, and (c) literature searches. Tools identified were assessed for readability using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) readability formula. The complexity of documents (i.e., forms collecting family history information) was assessed using the PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability formula. RESULTS: A total of 78 tools were identified, 47 of which met the criteria for inclusion. SMOG reading grade levels for multimedia-based tools ranged from 10.1 to 18.3, with an average score of 13.6. For print-based tools, SMOG ranged from 8.7 to 14.1, with an average score of 12.0. Document complexity ranged from very low complexity (level 1 proficiency) to high complexity (level 4 proficiency). CONCLUSION: The majority of tools are written at a reading grade level that is beyond the 8th grade average reading level in the United States. The lack of family history tools that are easy to read or use may compromise their potential effectiveness in identifying individuals at increased risk for chronic diseases in the general population.
Authors: John M Quillin; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Joseph Borzelleca; Joann Bodurtha; Deborah Bowen; Diane Baer Wilson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Elissa M Ozanne; Andrea Loberg; Sherwood Hughes; Christine Lawrence; Brian Drohan; Alan Semine; Michael Jellinek; Claire Cronin; Frederick Milham; Dana Dowd; Caroline Block; Deborah Lockhart; John Sharko; Georges Grinstein; Kevin S Hughes Journal: Breast J Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Kevin S Hughes; Constance Roche; Curtis T Campbell; Nancy Siegel; Lisa Salisbury; Amy Chekos; Maya S Katz; Erica Edell Journal: Breast J Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Laura M Koehly; Sato Ashida; Andrea F Goergen; Kaley F Skapinsky; Donald W Hadley; Anna V Wilkinson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Catharine Wang; Ananda Sen; Mack T Ruffin; Donald E Nease; Robert Gramling; Louise S Acheson; Suzanne M O'Neill; Wendy S Rubinstein Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Joann N Bodurtha; Donna McClish; Maria Gyure; Rosalie Corona; Alexander H Krist; Vivian M Rodríguez; Alisa M Maibauer; Joseph Borzelleca; Deborah J Bowen; John M Quillin Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Catharine Wang; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Deborah J Bowen; Howard Cabral; Michael R Winter; Tricia Norkunas Cunningham; Michelle Trevino-Talbot; Diana M Toledo; Dharma E Cortes; MaryAnn Campion; Timothy Bickmore Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2021-02-18
Authors: Christina M Pettey; Jean C McSweeney; Katharine E Stewart; Elvin T Price; Mario A Cleves; Seongkum Heo; Elaine Souder Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.908