Literature DB >> 25096803

A primary care audit of familial risk in patients with a personal history of breast cancer.

Paul Nathan1, Aneeta Ahluwalia, Wendy Chorley.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women, both in the UK and worldwide. A small proportion of women are at very high risk of breast cancer, having a particularly strong family history. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has advised that practitioners should not, in most instances, actively seek to identify women with a family history of breast cancer. An audit was undertaken at an urban primary care practice of 15,000 patients, using a paper-based, self-administered questionnaire sent to patients identified with a personal history of breast cancer. The aim of this audit was to determine whether using targeted screening of relatives of patients with breast cancer to identify familial cancer risk is worthwhile in primary care. Since these patients might already expected to have been risk assessed following their initial diagnosis, this audit acts as a quality improvement exercise. The audit used a validated family history questionnaire and risk assessment tool as a screening approach for identifying and grading familial risk in line with the NICE guidelines, to guide referral to the familial cancer screening service. The response rate to family history questionnaires was 54 % and the majority of patients responded positively to their practitioner seeking to identify familial cancer risks in their family. Of the 57 returned questionnaires, over a half (54 %) contained pedigrees with individuals eligible for referral. Patients and their relatives who are often registered with the practice welcome the discussion. An appropriate referral can therefore be made. The findings suggest a role for primary care practitioners in the identification of those at higher familial risk. However integrated systems and processes need designing to facilitate this work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25096803     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9737-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  13 in total

1.  Clinically relevant changes in family history of cancer over time.

Authors:  Argyrios Ziogas; Nora K Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Jan T Lowery; Susan M Domchek; Claudine Isaacs; Constance A Griffin; Patricia G Moorman; Karen L Edwards; Deirdre A Hill; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Tomlinson; Hoda Anton-Culver; Louise C Strong; Carol H Kasten; Dianne M Finkelstein; Sharon E Plon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Women's views of consultations about familial risk of breast cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Gunn E Grande; Fawzia Hyland; Fiona M Walter; Ann Louise Kinmonth
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-12

3.  Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases.

Authors:  J Emery; R Walton; M Murphy; J Austoker; P Yudkin; C Chapman; A Coulson; D Glasspool; J Fox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-01

Review 4.  Clinical management of hereditary breast cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Amy S Clark; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Collecting genetic information in primary care: evaluating a new family history tool.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; Jane Bethea; Bernadette Modell; Paul Brennan; Alexia Papageorgiou; Sandy Raeburn; Rhydian Hapgood; Michael Modell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  The assessment of genetic risk of breast cancer: a set of GP guidelines.

Authors:  G H de Bock; T P Vliet Vlieland; G C Hageman; J C Oosterwijk; M P Springer; J Kievit
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 7.  Familial breast cancer: is it time to move from a reactive to a proactive role?

Authors:  H Harris; I Nippert; C Julian-Reynier; J Schmidtke; C van Asperen; D Gadzicki; A Tibben; D G Evans
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data.

Authors:  M P Coleman; D Forman; H Bryant; J Butler; B Rachet; C Maringe; U Nur; E Tracey; M Coory; J Hatcher; C E McGahan; D Turner; L Marrett; M L Gjerstorff; T B Johannesen; J Adolfsson; M Lambe; G Lawrence; D Meechan; E J Morris; R Middleton; J Steward; M A Richards
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Genetic testing for breast cancer: where are health care providers in the decision process?

Authors:  C M Velicer; S Taplin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

1.  Time to rethink the capture and use of family history in primary care.

Authors:  Paul A Nathan; Owen Johnson; Susan Clamp; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.386

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.