Literature DB >> 12551673

Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurement methods in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.

Katharina Kriechbaum1, Oliver Findl, Barbara Kiss, Stefan Sacu, Vanessa Petternel, Wolfgang Drexler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements in phakic and pseudophakic eyes using a slit-beam photographic technique (IOLMaster, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) with those obtained with the laboratory prototype version of partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and with conventional applanation ultrasound in phakic eyes.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna University, Vienna, Austria.
METHODS: Thirty-three ACDs of 28 patients with age-related cataract were measured preoperatively with a slit-beam photographic technique (IOLMaster) and the prototype version of PCI. In 24 eyes, the ACD was also assessed with applanation ultrasound. In addition, 34 ACDs of 18 pseudophakic patients in a different study population were examined postoperatively with the IOLMaster and PCI.
RESULTS: The median ACD in the phakic eyes was 3.06 mm (range 1.93 to 3.90 mm) with the IOLMaster, 3.09 mm with PCI (range 1.49 to 4.06 mm), and 2.87 mm (range 2.18 to 3.33 mm) with applanation ultrasound. The precision was 0.005 mm for PCI and 0.015 mm for IOLMaster measurement. The median difference between the IOLMaster and PCI ACD biometry was 0.01 mm +/- 0.14 (SD) (range -0.44 to 0.17 mm) (P =.71). In pseudophakic eyes, the 2 methods showed a median difference of -0.22 mm (range -0.45 to 1.99 mm) (P >.1) and did not correlate (r = 0.21; P >.2).
CONCLUSIONS: In phakic eyes, the difference between IOLMaster and PCI measurements was small and not statistically significant. In pseudophakic eyes, the difference was larger and the methods did not correlate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12551673     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01822-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  14 in total

Review 1.  Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts.

Authors:  R Menapace; O Findl; K Kriechbaum; Ch Leydolt-Koeppl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Anterior chamber width measurement by high-speed optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jason A Goldsmith; Yan Li; Maria Regina Chalita; Volker Westphal; Chetan A Patil; Andrew M Rollins; Joseph A Izatt; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Three-dimensional ultrasound biomicroscopy, environmental and conventional scanning electron microscopy investigations of the human zonula ciliaris for numerical modelling of accommodation.

Authors:  Oliver Stachs; Heiner Martin; Detlef Behrend; Klaus-Peter Schmitz; Rudolf Guthoff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  [Three-dimensional ultrasound biomicroscopic examinations for haptic differentiation of potentially accommodative intraocular lenses].

Authors:  O Stachs; H Schneider; J Stave; R Beck; R F Guthoff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens.

Authors:  Hanka Schneider; Oliver Stachs; Katja Göbel; Rudolf Guthoff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  [Precision of a new device for biometric measurements in pseudophakic eyes].

Authors:  A L Hildebrandt; G U Auffarth; M P Holzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Evaluation of biometric methods for measuring the anterior chamber depth in the non-contact mode.

Authors:  B Meinhardt; O Stachs; J Stave; R Beck; R Guthoff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Comparison of the biometric values obtained by two different A-mode ultrasound devices (Eye Cubed vs. PalmScan): a transversal, descriptive, and comparative study.

Authors:  Raul Velez-Montoya; Eugene Mark Shusterman; Miriam Jessica López-Miranda; Mariana Mayorquin-Ruiz; Guillermo Salcedo-Villanueva; Hugo Quiroz-Mercado; Virgilio Morales-Cantón
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  [Measurement of accommodation using optical biometry].

Authors:  A Nurispahic; K Kotliar; I Lanzl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Scheimpflug/Placido Photography-Based Topography System and IOLMaster Partial Coherence Interferometry in Patients with Cataracts.

Authors:  Jinhai Huang; Na Liao; Giacomo Savini; Fangjun Bao; Ye Yu; Weicong Lu; Qingjie Hu; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.