Literature DB >> 3371045

Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit.

P Fernandez-Segoviano1, A Lázaro, A Esteban, J M Rubio, J R Iruretagoyena.   

Abstract

A prospective study of 100 autopsies was carried out. The clinical and pathologic diagnoses were made independently by intensivists and pathologists; at the end of the study, the differences were determined. There were seven Class I errors (which if detected before death, would probably have led to a change in management that might have resulted in cure or prolonged survival), six of these relating to the basic disease and one to the cause of death. Class II errors occurred in 15 patients, ten relating to the basic disease and five to the cause of death. In 61% of the patients, the major and minor diagnoses coincided. In 77% of the patients, the major diagnoses coincided. No relationship was found between the incidence of Class I and Class II errors and the length of the patients' stay in the ICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3371045     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198807000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  20 in total

Review 1.  Acp. Best practice no 155. Pathological investigation of deaths following surgery, anaesthesia, and medical procedures.

Authors:  R D Start; S S Cross
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Should the autopsy be resuscitated?

Authors:  F Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Is autopsy dead in the ICU?

Authors:  A Esteban; P Fernández-Segoviano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Trends of accuracy of clinical diagnoses of the basic cause of death in a university hospital.

Authors:  M H C Grade; S Zucoloto; J K Kajiwara; M T P Fernandes; L G F Couto; S B Garcia
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Calliope Maris; Benoît Martin; Jacques Creteur; Myriam Remmelink; Michael Piagnerelli; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pieter Demetter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Significance of the isolation of Candida species from airway samples in critically ill patients: a prospective, autopsy study.

Authors:  W Meersseman; K Lagrou; I Spriet; J Maertens; E Verbeken; W E Peetermans; E Van Wijngaerden
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Prospective study of the value of necropsy examination in early death after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A H Lee; B T Borek; P J Gallagher; R Saunders; R K Lamb; S A Livesey; V T Tsang; J L Monro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Are coroners' necropsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a "view and grant" system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales.

Authors:  G N Rutty; R M Duerden; N Carter; J C Clark
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Surgical audit without autopsy: tales of the unexpected.

Authors:  D A Mosquera; M D Goldman
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.