Literature DB >> 8295287

A comparison of public attitudes toward autopsy, organ donation, and anatomic dissection. A Swedish survey.

M Sanner1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate people's reactions to procedures involving the dead body by comparing their attitudes toward autopsy, organ donation, and dissection.
DESIGN: Survey, using a questionnaire with 24 items that address reactions toward autopsy, organ donation, and donation of the whole body, including religious and sociodemographic issues. PARTICIPANTS: An age-stratified, random sample of 1950 individuals in Sweden, 18 to 75 years old. The response rate was 65%.
RESULTS: Eighty-four percent reported acceptance of an autopsy for themselves and 80% for a close relative. Sixty-two percent were willing to donate their own organs and 39% to donate the organs of a family member; 15% accepted donation of their whole body for dissection. Practically all who accepted dissection also were willing to donate their organs and to be autopsied; practically all who were willing to donate their organs also accepted autopsy. About 65% to 70% felt some discomfort at the thought of autopsy and organ donation. Women seemed more sensitive toward operations on the dead body than men.
CONCLUSIONS: The rank order of medical procedures after death, based on the proportion of individuals positive toward the procedures, can be used to form a scale with autopsy and dissection at each end point and organ donation in the middle. This scale has the characteristics of a Guttman scale and can be looked on as a comfort-discomfort continuum regarding procedures involving the dead body.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8295287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  14 in total

1.  Should the autopsy be resuscitated?

Authors:  F Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The clinical, research, and social value of autopsy after any cancer death: a perspective from the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee.

Authors:  Sheri L Spunt; Sara O Vargas; Cheryl M Coffin; Stephen X Skapek; David M Parham; Joan Darling; Douglas S Hawkins; Charles Keller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Understanding selective refusal of eye donation. Identity, beauty, and interpersonal relationships.

Authors:  Mitchell Lawlor; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  May we practise endotracheal intubation on the newly dead?

Authors:  M Ardagh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Attitudes of medical students to necropsy.

Authors:  N J Botega; K Metze; E Marques; A Cruvinel; Z V Moraes; L Augusto; L A Costa
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  [Autopsy-a procedure of medical history?].

Authors:  K Petros; C Wittekind
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Public perceptions of necropsy.

Authors:  R D Start; C A Saul; D W Cotton; N J Mathers; J C Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Still Human: A Call for Increased Focus on Ethical Standards in Cadaver Research.

Authors:  Michelle C Bach
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-12

Review 9.  Clinical review: What is the role for autopsy in the ICU?

Authors:  Greet Yvonne Agnes De Vlieger; Elien Marie Jeanne Lia Mahieu; Wouter Meersseman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Individuals' decision to co-donate or donate alone: an archival study of married whole body donors in Hawaii.

Authors:  Michel Anteby; Filiz Garip; Paul V Martorana; Scott Lozanoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.