Literature DB >> 12531764

Computer simulations of patellofemoral joint surgery. Patient-specific models for tuberosity transfer.

Zohara A Cohen1, Jack H Henry, Denise M McCarthy, Van C Mow, Gerard A Ateshian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Variable clinical outcomes of tibial tuberosity transfer surgery have been reported. HYPOTHESES: The biomechanical outcome of surgery is patient-specific; no single procedure produces superior results for all patients. Use of patient-specific computer models can optimize choice of procedure. STUDY
DESIGN: Computer simulation study using clinical data.
METHODS: We used patient-specific multibody models of the patellofemoral joints of 20 patients with a diagnosis of patellar subluxation and osteoarthritis. Four tibial tuberosity transfer procedures (two anterior and two anteromedial) were simulated for each patient and compared with their preoperative model.
RESULTS: When results for all patients were averaged, all simulated operations produced a statistically significant decrease in surface-wide mean contact stress, although no significant difference was found among them.
CONCLUSIONS: The simulated surgical outcomes were patient-specific: no single procedure was consistently superior at decreasing peak or mean stress and each procedure produced a potentially detrimental outcome, an increase in either mean stress or peak stress, in at least one patient. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Computer simulation may serve as a valuable tool for tailoring procedures to specific patients. Copyright 2003 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12531764     DOI: 10.1177/03635465030310012701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  29 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment for early osteoarthritis. Part II: allografts and concurrent procedures.

Authors:  A H Gomoll; G Filardo; F K Almqvist; W D Bugbee; M Jelic; J C Monllau; G Puddu; W G Rodkey; P Verdonk; R Verdonk; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A methodology to accurately quantify patellofemoral cartilage contact kinematics by combining 3D image shape registration and cine-PC MRI velocity data.

Authors:  Bhushan S Borotikar; William H Sipprell; Emily E Wible; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Multibody dynamic simulation of knee contact mechanics.

Authors:  Yanhong Bei; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Dynamic simulation of tibial tuberosity realignment: model evaluation.

Authors:  Tserenchimed Purevsuren; John J Elias; Kyungsoo Kim; Yoon Hyuk Kim
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 5.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 6.  Patellofemoral joint biomechanics and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian; Clark T Hung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Computationally efficient magnetic resonance imaging based surface contact modeling as a tool to evaluate joint injuries and outcomes of surgical interventions compared to finite element modeling.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Phil Lee; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Kenneth J Fischer
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Tibial tuberosity osteotomy for patellofemoral realignment alters tibiofemoral kinematics.

Authors:  Saandeep Mani; Marcus S Kirkpatrick; Archana Saranathan; Laura G Smith; Andrew J Cosgarea; John J Elias
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Discrete element analysis for characterizing the patellofemoral pressure distribution: model evaluation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Archana Saranathan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Validation of predicted patellofemoral mechanics in a finite element model of the healthy and cruciate-deficient knee.

Authors:  Azhar A Ali; Sami S Shalhoub; Adam J Cyr; Clare K Fitzpatrick; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.