Literature DB >> 12515782

Trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality: an analysis of mortality change by screening intensity.

Andrew J Coldman1, Norman Phillips, Thomas A Pickles.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of death from prostate cancer has recently declined in many areas of the world. Over the past 15 years prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has increased in popularity, which has resulted in increases in the incidence of prostate cancer. Over the same period there have been changes in the management of the disease and, in particular, the use of androgen ablation. We set out to examine the relation between changes in prostate cancer incidence (a surrogate for PSA screening) and subsequent changes in mortality in regions using common treatment recommendations.
METHODS: We used data from prostate cancer cases and deaths reported to the British Columbia Cancer Registry during 1985-1999 to examine trends in incidence and mortality in 88 small health areas (SHAs) among men aged 50-74 years. We conducted 2 analyses. In the first we classified the SHAs by intensity of PSA screening (low, medium or high) according to their ranked age-standardized incidence rate of prostate cancer in 1990-1994 and examined subsequent trends in prostate cancer mortality. In the second analysis we examined the SHA-specific relative change in prostate cancer incidence between 1985-1989 and 1990-1994 and correlated it with the relative change in mortality for cases diagnosed after 1990.
RESULTS: Between 1985-1989 and 1990-1994 the incidence of prostate cancer increased by 53.2% and 14.6% among men aged 50-74 and those 75 and over respectively. Between 1985-1989 and 1995-1999 prostate cancer mortality declined by 17.6% and 7.9% in the 2 age groups respectively. Among men aged 50-74 years SHAs with low, middle and high levels of screening had respective increases in prostate cancer incidence of 5.4%, 53.6% and 70.5% between 1985-1989 and 1990-1994. Corresponding decreases in mortality between 1985-1989 and 1995-1999 were 28.9%, 18.0% and 13.5%. Mortality declines were greatest in SHAs with low screening levels (p = 0.032). Before 1990 prostate cancer mortality was similar in the 3 screening groups (p = 0.72). Regions with the smallest increases in incidence had the largest declines in mortality.
INTERPRETATION: We found no association between the intensity of PSA screening and subsequent decreases in prostate cancer mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12515782      PMCID: PMC139315     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of trends in prostate-cancer mortality in England and Wales and the USA.

Authors:  S E Oliver; D Gunnell; J L Donovan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Screening for prostate cancer in the UK. Seems to be creeping in by the back door.

Authors:  J L Donovan; S J Frankel; D E Neal; F C Hamdy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

3.  Prostate cancer: different incidence but not mortality trends within two areas of Tuscany, Italy.

Authors:  E Crocetti; S Ciatto; M Zappa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  How much of the recent rise in breast cancer incidence can be explained by increases in mammography utilization? A dynamic population model approach.

Authors:  E J Feuer; L M Wun
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001--testing for early lung cancer detection.

Authors:  R A Smith; A C von Eschenbach; R Wender; B Levin; T Byers; D Rothenberger; D Brooks; W Creasman; C Cohen; C Runowicz; D Saslow; V Cokkinides; H Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria.

Authors:  G Bartsch; W Horninger; H Klocker; A Reissigl; W Oberaigner; D Schönitzer; G Severi; C Robertson; P Boyle
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  PSA screening and prostate cancer mortality.

Authors:  Linda Perron; Lynne Moore; Isabelle Bairati; Paul-Marie Bernard; François Meyer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; T L Ratliff; J W Basler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Geographic pathology of latent prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  R Yatani; I Chigusa; K Akazaki; G N Stemmermann; R A Welsh; P Correa
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1982-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  15 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening: Attitudes and practices of family physicians in Ontario.

Authors:  Christopher B Allard; Shawn Dason; Janis Lusis; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Predictive medicine in urology.

Authors:  Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Nuria Malats; Pierfrancesco Bassi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The changing age distribution of prostate cancer in Canada.

Authors:  C Ineke Neutel; Ru-Nie Gao; Paul A Blood; Leslie A Gaudette
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

4.  Targeting CWR22Rv1 prostate cancer cell proliferation and gene expression by combinations of the phytochemicals EGCG, genistein and quercetin.

Authors:  Tze-Chen Hsieh; Joseph M Wu
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  The impact of place and time on the proportion of late-stage diagnosis: the case of prostate cancer in Florida, 1981-2007.

Authors:  Pierre Goovaerts; Hong Xiao
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-13

6.  [Secondary prevention after urological tumor diseases. Focusing on the kidneys, testes, and bladder].

Authors:  M J Mathers; D A Lazica; T Klotz; F Sommer; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Prognostic potential of ERG (ETS-related gene) expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A Marcell Szász; Attila Majoros; Philip Rosen; Shiv Srivastava; Albert Dobi; Attila Szendrői; Janina Kulka; Péter Nyirády
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975-2004: an ecological study.

Authors:  Simon M Collin; Richard M Martin; Chris Metcalfe; David Gunnell; Peter C Albertsen; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Peter Stephens; J Athene Lane; Rollo Moore; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Current status of PSA screening. Early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tom Pickles
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Factors related to use of prostate cancer screening: the Alberta Tomorrow Project.

Authors:  Harriet Richardson; Kristan J Aronson; Alison James; Elizabeth S McGregor; Heather Bryant
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2007-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.