Literature DB >> 18424233

Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975-2004: an ecological study.

Simon M Collin1, Richard M Martin, Chris Metcalfe, David Gunnell, Peter C Albertsen, David Neal, Freddie Hamdy, Peter Stephens, J Athene Lane, Rollo Moore, Jenny Donovan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no conclusive evidence that screening based on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests decreases prostate-cancer mortality. Since its introduction in the USA around 1990, uptake of PSA testing has been rapid in the USA, but much less common in the UK. Our aim was to study trends over time in prostate-cancer mortality and incidence in the USA and UK in 1975-2004, and compare these patterns with trends in screening and treatment.
METHODS: Joinpoint regression analysis of cancer-mortality statistics from Cancer Research UK (London, UK) and from the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) programme from 1975 to 2004 was used to estimate the annual percentage change in prostate-cancer mortality in both countries and the points in time when trends changed. The ratio of USA to UK age-adjusted prostate-cancer incidence was also assessed.
FINDINGS: Age-specific and age-adjusted prostate-cancer mortality peaked in the early 1990s at almost identical rates in both countries, but age-adjusted mortality in the USA subsequently declined after 1994 by -4.17% (95% CI -4.34 to -3.99) each year, four-times the rate of decline in the UK after 1992 (-1.14% [-1.44 to -0.84]). The mortality decline in the USA was greatest and most sustained in patients aged 75 years or older (-5.32% [-8.23 to -2.32]), whereas death rates had plateaued in this age group in the UK by 2000. The mean ratio of USA to UK age-adjusted prostate-cancer incidence rates in 1975-2003 was 2.5, with a pronounced peak around the time that PSA testing was introduced in the USA. Numbers needed to treat to prevent one death from prostate cancer were 33 000 in the 55-64-year age group.
INTERPRETATION: The striking decline in prostate-cancer mortality in the USA compared with the UK in 1994-2004 coincided with much higher uptake of PSA screening in the USA. Explanations for the different trends in mortality include the possibility of an early effect of initial screening rounds on men with more aggressive asymptomatic disease in the USA, different approaches to treatment in the two countries, and bias related to the misattribution of cause of death. Speculation over the role of screening will continue until evidence from randomised controlled trials is published.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424233      PMCID: PMC2760747          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70104-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  60 in total

1.  Comparison of trends in prostate-cancer mortality in England and Wales and the USA.

Authors:  S E Oliver; D Gunnell; J L Donovan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates.

Authors:  H J Kim; M P Fay; E J Feuer; D N Midthune
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Re: Prostate cancer incidence and mortality in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A Shibata; A S Whittemore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Impact of screening on incidence and mortality of prostate cancer in the United States.

Authors:  A L Potosky; E J Feuer; D L Levin
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  International trends in prostate-cancer mortality in the "PSA ERA".

Authors:  S E Oliver; M T May; D Gunnell
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Prostate cancer treatment with radiotherapy: maturing methods that minimize morbidity.

Authors:  A Pollack; G K Zagars; I I Rosen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Causes of death in elderly prostate cancer patients and in a comparison nonprostate cancer cohort.

Authors:  C J Newschaffer; K Otani; M K McDonald; L T Penberthy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Prostate Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Trends in the utilization of androgen-deprivation therapy for patients with prostate carcinoma suggest an effect on mortality.

Authors:  R Y Demers; A Tiwari; J Wei; L K Weiss; R K Severson; J Montie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Changing trends in prostatic cancer.

Authors:  M Murphy; C Johnston; P Whelan; L Rider; S N Lloyd
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  66 in total

1.  Screening for prostate cancer using multivariate mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Christopher H Morrell; Larry J Brant; Shan Sheng; E Jeffrey Metter
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.404

2.  Editorial and introduction to Asian Journal of Andrology Prostate Cancer special issue.

Authors:  Roger Kirby; Shu-Jie Xia
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Treatment for PSA screen-detected prostate cancer: what are the options?

Authors:  R Tim D Oliver; David E Neal
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-01-27

4.  Does the presence of robotic surgery affect demographics in patients choosing to undergo radical prostatectomy? A multi-center contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Philippa J Cheetham; Daniel J Lee; Anna Rose-Morris; Simon F Brewster; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-10

5.  [Prostatic carcinoma screening: sense ur nonsense?].

Authors:  Stephan Madersbacher; Christian Vutuc
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Trends in prostate specific antigen testing in Ireland: lessons from a country without guidelines.

Authors:  F J Drummond; A-E Carsin; L Sharp; H Comber
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 tumors in a population based cohort.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Claudia A Salinas; Daniel W Lin; Suzanne Kolb; Joseph Koopmeiners; Ziding Feng; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Diagnostic strategies and the incidence of prostate cancer: reasons for the low reported incidence of prostate cancer in China.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Shan Wu; Li-Rong Guo; Xue-Jian Zhao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Declining death rates reflect progress against cancer.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward; Michael Thun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  N L Sharma; N C Shah; D E Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.