Literature DB >> 24212401

Colonoscopy as a tool for evaluating colorectal tumor development in a mouse model.

Tomohiro Adachi1, Takao Hinoi, Yuu Sasaki, Hiroaki Niitsu, Yasuhumi Saito, Masashi Miguchi, Manabu Shimomura, Hideki Ohdan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A sporadic colon cancer mouse model with conditional mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) is biologically relevant for human colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to determine the utility and limitations of colonoscopy for evaluating colon tumors in this mouse model.
METHODS: We compared the estimates of location, size, and miss rate of tumors detected during colonoscopy with those determined by necropsy. Sixty-six CPC-Apc mice originating from Apc (F/wt) mice harbor a Cdx2-Cre transgene in which colorectal tumorigenesis was driven by Apc allelic loss. The sensitivity and specificity of colonoscopy for detecting tumors in a mouse CRC model were investigated.
RESULTS: A strong positive correlation was found between tumor location as measured by colonoscopy and the location determined by necropsy (p < 0.001). A total of 120 tumors were graded during colonoscopy (grades 1-5: 0, 8, 20, 27, and 65 lesions, respectively), and a strong positive correlation was found between the tumor grade determined by colonoscopy and size measured by necropsy (grades 2-5: 2.08, 2.98, 4.02, and 5.09 mm, respectively; p < 0.005). Although the miss rate was 47.1 %, most of the missed tumors (96 %) were in close proximity (within 5 mm) of another tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: A colonoscopic method for the reliable measurement of colorectal tumors in vivo has been established. The application of this technique to mouse models of colon carcinogenesis will provide a better understanding of the dynamics of tumor growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24212401     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1791-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  Molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: implications for molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  Christian N Arnold; Ajay Goel; Hubert E Blum; C Richard Boland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  High resolution colonoscopy in live mice.

Authors:  C Becker; M C Fantini; M F Neurath
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Update on colorectal cancer imaging.

Authors:  Marc J Gollub; Lawrence H Schwartz; Tim Akhurst
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Detection and volume determination of colonic tumors in Min mice by magnetic resonance micro-imaging.

Authors:  Harvey H Hensley; Wen-Chi Chang; Margie L Clapper
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens.

Authors:  Georges Postic; David Lewin; Charles Bickerstaff; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Colon polyps and cancer.

Authors:  J H Bond
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Mouse model of colonic adenoma-carcinoma progression based on somatic Apc inactivation.

Authors:  Takao Hinoi; Aytekin Akyol; Brian K Theisen; David O Ferguson; Joel K Greenson; Bart O Williams; Kathleen R Cho; Eric R Fearon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Molecular diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  S M Powell; G M Petersen; A J Krush; S Booker; J Jen; F M Giardiello; S R Hamilton; B Vogelstein; K W Kinzler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The Miss Rate for Colorectal Adenoma Determined by Quality-Adjusted, Back-to-Back Colonoscopies.

Authors:  Sang Bong Ahn; Dong Soo Han; Joong Ho Bae; Tae Jun Byun; Jong Pyo Kim; Chang Soo Eun
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.519

View more
  5 in total

1.  Intermittent Dosing with Sulindac Provides Effective Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention in the Azoxymethane-Treated Mouse Model.

Authors:  Swati Chandra; Ariel C Nymeyer; Photini Faith Rice; Eugene W Gerner; Jennifer K Barton
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-06-13

2.  Novel isolated cecal pouch model for endoscopic observation in rats.

Authors:  Kurodo Koshino; Nobuo Kanai; Masayuki Yamato; Teruo Okano; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Identifying the tumor location-associated candidate genes in development of new drugs for colorectal cancer using machine-learning-based approach.

Authors:  Tuncay Bayrak; Zafer Çetin; E İlker Saygılı; Hasan Ogul
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Assessment of murine colorectal cancer by micro-ultrasound using three dimensional reconstruction and non-linear contrast imaging.

Authors:  Jessica L Freeling; Khosrow Rezvani
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.698

5.  Signal regulatory protein alpha blockade potentiates tumoricidal effects of macrophages on gastroenterological neoplastic cells in syngeneic immunocompetent mice.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Abe; Yuka Tanaka; Jinlian Piao; Naoki Tanimine; Naohide Oue; Takao Hinoi; Noel Verjan Garcia; Masayuki Miyasaka; Takashi Matozaki; Wataru Yasui; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-09-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.