Literature DB >> 12509028

Method of improved scatterer size estimation and application to parametric imaging using ultrasound.

Michael L Oelze1, William D O'Brien.   

Abstract

The frequency dependence of RF signals backscattered from random media (tissues) has been used to describe the microstructure of the media. The frequency dependence of the backscattered RF signal is seen in the power spectrum. Estimates of scatterer properties (average scatterer size) from an interrogated medium are made by minimizing the average squared deviation (MASD) between the measured power spectrum and a theoretical power spectrum over an analysis bandwidth. Estimates of the scatterer properties become increasingly inaccurate as the average signal to noise ratio (SNR) over the analysis bandwidth becomes smaller. Some frequency components in the analysis bandwidth of the measured power spectrum will have smaller SNR than other frequency components. The accuracy of estimates can be improved by weighting the frequency components that have the smallest SNR less than the frequencies with the largest SNR in the MASD. A weighting function is devised that minimizes the noise effects on the estimates of the average scatterer sizes. Simulations and phantom experiments are conducted that show the weighting function gives improved estimates in an attenuating medium. The weighting function is applied to parametric images using scatterer size estimates of a rat that had developed a spontaneous mammary tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12509028     DOI: 10.1121/1.1517064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Adaptive attenuation correction during H-scan ultrasound imaging using K-means clustering.

Authors:  Haowei Tai; Mawia Khairalseed; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Improving the statistics of quantitative ultrasound techniques with deformation compounding: an experimental study.

Authors:  Maria-Teresa Herd; Timothy J Hall; Jingfeng Jiang; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Limitations on estimation of effective scatterer diameters.

Authors:  Yang Zhu; Aiguo Han; William D O'Brien; Michael L Oelze; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial Angular Compounding Technique for H-Scan Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Mawia Khairalseed; Fangyuan Xiong; Jung-Whan Kim; Robert F Mattrey; Kevin J Parker; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.

Authors:  Wu Liu; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kibo Nam; Timothy J Hall; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy- histotripsy.

Authors:  Tzu-yin Wang; Zhen Xu; Frank Winterroth; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Edward D Rothman; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Conventional frequency ultrasonic biomarkers of cancer treatment response in vivo.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Omar Falou; Hadi Tadayyon; Azza Al-Mahrouki; William Tran; Naum Papanicolau; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.

Authors:  W Liu; J A Zagzebski; T J Hall; E L Madsen; T Varghese; M A Kliewer; S Panda; C Lowery; S Barnes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.