Literature DB >> 22528118

Evaluation of current biologic meshes in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Ashley Cox1, Sender Herschorn.   

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common disorder estimated to affect 15%-30% of women over the age of 50 years. About 11% of women will require surgery by the age of 80 years and there is an estimated 30% rate of prolapse recurrence. In an attempt to improve surgical outcomes, biologic grafts and synthetic meshes have been implemented in the repair of POP. Biologic grafts have been used with the hope of avoiding complications associated with synthetic mesh. This presents the existing data surrounding the use of biologic grafts in the surgical repair of anterior compartment, vaginal vault, and posterior compartment prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528118     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-012-0252-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  46 in total

1.  Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Paulo Cezar Feldner; Rodrigo Aquino Castro; Luiz Antonio Cipolotti; Carlos Antonio Delroy; Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori; Manoel João Batista Castello Girão
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Tristi W Muir; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Initial experience with rectocele repair using nonfrozen cadaveric fascia lata interposition.

Authors:  Kathleen C Kobashi; Gary E Leach; Robert Frederick; Dimitri D Kuznetsov; Kenneth C Hsiao
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Bo Anzen; Sophia Brismar; Annika Lopez; Jan Zetterström
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The antigenicity of fascia lata allografts.

Authors:  M P Fitzgerald; J Mollenhauer; L Brubaker
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Fecal continence after rectocele repair: a prospective study.

Authors:  J H van Dam; W M Huisman; W C Hop; W R Schouten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Susan B Tate; Linda Blackwell; Douglas J Lorenz; Margaret M Steptoe; Patrick J Culligan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair.

Authors:  N Kohli; J R Miklos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-02-13

9.  Calcification and identification of metalloproteinases in bovine pericardium after subcutaneous implantation in rats.

Authors:  E Jorge-Herrero; J Turnay; P Calero; N Olmo; I López De Silanes; M Martín Maestro; M A Lizarbe; J L Castillo-Olivares
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Anterior repair with or without collagen matrix reinforcement: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nathan L Guerette; Thais V Peterson; Oscar A Aguirre; Douglas M VanDrie; Daniel H Biller; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of polypropylene mesh and porcine-derived, cross-linked urinary bladder matrix materials implanted in the rabbit vagina and abdomen.

Authors:  Xuemei Fan; Yanzhou Wang; Yu Wang; Huicheng Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.