Literature DB >> 19421800

[Vaginal descensus and prolapse. Which operative technique?].

M F Hamann1, C Seif.   

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of genital prolapse, there are only few studies so far fulfilling the strict criteria of evidence-oriented data acquisition. On the one hand, this complicates the definition of reliable therapy recommendations, on the other hand, it sounds a note of caution in the application of therapy approaches which are new and have not yet been evaluated adequately.The systematic assessment of common therapy concepts for female genital prolapse and its accompanying pathologies has led to a better understanding of the functional and anatomical background within the last few years. Thus, any invasive anatomical correction should strictly be used with the aim of functional improvement and with evidence of persisting effectivity. Under this premise, traditional methods of vaginal and abdominal prolapse repair still come into use. The choice of the operative technique arises from carefully differentiated, interdisciplinary diagnostics and surgery should be performed in experienced centers.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19421800     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-009-1977-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  21 in total

1.  Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Tristi W Muir; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.

Authors:  C Maher; K Baessler; C M A Glazener; E J Adams; S Hagen
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles.

Authors:  P K Sand; S Koduri; R W Lobel; H A Winkler; J Tomezsko; P J Culligan; R Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series.

Authors:  Sohier Elneil; Alfred S Cutner; Mary Remy; Andrew T Leather; Philip Toozs-Hobson; Brian Wise
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Vaginal paravaginal repair: one-year outcomes.

Authors:  S B Young; J J Daman; L G Bony
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments.

Authors:  B L Shull; C Bachofen; K W Coates; T J Kuehl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A randomized comparison of tension-free vaginal tape and endopelvic fascia plication in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Michele Meschia; Paola Pifarotti; Maurizio Spennacchio; Arturo Buonaguidi; Umberto Gattei; Edgardo Somigliana
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh.

Authors:  Patrick J Culligan; Miles Murphy; Linda Blackwell; Grant Hammons; Carol Graham; Michael H Heit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy.

Authors:  Shawna Brizzolara; Anita Pillai-Allen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.