Literature DB >> 12497031

A quantitative analysis of the costs and benefits of prostate cancer screening.

R M Benoit1, H Grönberg, M J Naslund.   

Abstract

The present study attempts to quantitate in an economically and clinically meaningful manner the cost and cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening and subsequent treatment, including complications from that treatment. Outcome data from large prostate cancer screening trials using prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) and PSA alone were used to construct the screening model. The benefit of screening is expressed in years of life saved by screening, which is calculated by comparing the survival rate of men with prostate cancer to the survival rate of men in the general population. The cost of screening, treatment, and complications were estimated using the Medicare data base and published reports on the cost, morbidity and mortality for radical prostatectomy. The cost per year of life saved by prostate cancer screening with PSA and DRE was $2339-3005 for men aged 50-59, $3905-5070 for men aged 60-69, and $3574-4627 overall for men aged 50-69. The cost per year of life saved by prostate cancer screening with PSA alone for men aged 50-70 was $3822-4956. A sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the cost per year of life saved by prostate cancer screening will not change substantially even if the assumptions in this model have been underestimated or overestimated by 100%. This study quantifies only those parameters which can be reliably compared in concrete terms such as dollars, treatment impact on survival, published complication rates and published treatment costs. Using this type of analysis, prostate cancer screening appears to be a cost-effective intervention. However, the issue of whether prostate cancer screening is cost-effective will be decided definitively only when randomized, controlled trials are available to quantify the costs and benefits of prostate cancer screening.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2001) 4, 138-145.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12497031     DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  8 in total

1.  A Markov model to analyze cost-effectiveness of screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).

Authors:  Kee Chan; Joie Davis; Sung-Yun Pai; Francisco A Bonilla; Jennifer M Puck; Michael Apkon
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.797

2.  Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; T M de Carvalho; A Auvinen; M Zappa; V Nelen; M Kwiatkowski; A Villers; A Páez; S M Moss; T L J Tammela; F Recker; L Denis; S V Carlsson; E M Wever; C H Bangma; F H Schröder; M J Roobol; J Hugosson; H J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Pathologic basis of focal therapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Janice M Mayes; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Screening for bladder cancer: a perspective.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Robert S Svatek; Núria Malats
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Economic Analysis.

Authors:  A Tawfik
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-05-01

6.  Benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening - predictions of the ONCOTYROL prostate cancer outcome and policy model.

Authors:  Nikolai Mühlberger; Kristijan Boskovic; Murray D Krahn; Karen E Bremner; Willi Oberaigner; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Gaby Sroczynski; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  An Ultra-Rapid Biosensory Point-of-Care (POC) Assay for Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Detection in Human Serum.

Authors:  Sophie Mavrikou; Georgia Moschopoulou; Athanasios Zafeirakis; Konstantina Kalogeropoulou; Georgios Giannakos; Athanasios Skevis; Spyridon Kintzios
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  The Clinical Efficacy of Prostate Cancer Screening in Worldwide and Iran: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Shima Shahyad; Seyed Hassan Saadat; Seyed-Mostafa Hosseini-Zijoud
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.