Literature DB >> 12488478

Views of American oncologists about the purposes of clinical trials.

Steven Joffe1, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many research subjects believe incorrectly that the primary purpose of clinical trials is to benefit the participants rather than to improve therapy for future patients. However, few data are available about how physicians view trials.
METHODS: We mailed surveys to a stratified random sample (n = 1120) of U.S. medical, pediatric, and other oncology specialists who were selected from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Membership Directory. Respondents were asked to select, from a list of options, their reasons for enrolling individual patients in trials and what they thought the main societal purposes of clinical trials are. We used logistic regression models to evaluate which demographic and clinical practice characteristics were associated with responses to these questions. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Of the 547 physicians (48.8%) who responded, 40.5% of the medical oncologists, 32.3% of the pediatric oncologists, and 62.6% of the other oncology subspecialists reported enrolling individual patients in clinical trials to improve future therapy. Most of the other respondents reported enrolling patients to ensure that they received state-of-the-art treatment. When asked about the main societal purpose of clinical trials, 72.7% of the medical oncologists, 59.4% of the pediatric oncologists, and 81.9% of the other oncology subspecialists cited improving future therapy; most of the other respondents cited ensuring state-of-the-art treatment for participants. In multivariable analysis, medical oncologists (odds ratio [OR] = 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3 to 0.9) and pediatric oncologists (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.5) were less likely than other oncologists to identify improving future therapy as the main societal purpose of clinical trials, whereas industry physicians (OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 1.1 to 20.5) chose this option more often than physicians who did not work for industry.
CONCLUSIONS: Many respondents viewed the main societal purpose of clinical trials as benefiting the participants rather than as creating generalizable knowledge to advance future therapy. This view, which was more prevalent among specialists such as pediatric oncologists that enrolled greater proportions of patients in trials, conflicts with established principles of research ethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12488478     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  25 in total

1.  The relevance of empirical research in bioethics.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; David Wendler
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey.

Authors:  Alphonse Taghian; Majid Mohiuddin; Reshma Jagsi; Saveli Goldberg; Elizabeth Ceilley; Simon Powell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Trust in early phase research: therapeutic optimism and protective pessimism.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Robert G Holloway; Samuel Frank; Renee Wilson; Karl Kieburtz
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-07-16

4.  The Effect of Receiving Treatment Within a Clinical Trial Setting on Survival and Quality of Care Perception in Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Taher Abu-Hejleh; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Christian Simon; Jane F Pendergast; Dingfeng Jiang; Carmen J Smith; Aaron T Porter; Knute D Carter; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Nurse Practitioners' attitudes about cancer clinical trials and willingness to recommend research participation.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Quiping Zhou; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Lichuan Ye; Christine Grady; Deborah Watkins-Bruner
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Confronting the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Nicole R Grieselhuber; Ira J Kodner; Douglas Brown; Jennifer Yu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  The ethical use of mandatory research biopsies.

Authors:  Erin M Olson; Nancy U Lin; Ian E Krop; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Clinical trial participation as part of end-of-life cancer care: associations with medical care and quality of life near death.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Jane C Weeks; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  What research ethics should learn from genomics and society research: lessons from the ELSI Congress of 2011.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; Eric T Juengst; Nancy M P King; Kristine Kuczynski; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 10.  Ethical issues in perinatal mental health research.

Authors:  Anna R Brandon; Geetha Shivakumar; Simon Craddock Lee; Stephen J Inrig; John Z Sadler
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.