Literature DB >> 19734786

Ethical issues in perinatal mental health research.

Anna R Brandon1, Geetha Shivakumar, Simon Craddock Lee, Stephen J Inrig, John Z Sadler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the background of current ethical standards for the conduct of perinatal mental health research and describe the ethical challenges in this research domain. RECENT
FINDINGS: Current literature reflects a growing sentiment in the scientific community that having no information regarding the impact of psychiatric treatment on the mother and developing fetus/infant poses dangers that may exceed the risks involved in research. However, without sufficient consensus across the scientific community, both regulatory bodies and perinatal researchers find themselves without a framework for decision making that satisfactorily limits the risks and facilitates the benefits of participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical research.
SUMMARY: Psychiatric research in perinatal mental health is critically important as it enables clinicians and patients to participate in informed decision-making concerning treatment for psychiatric disorders. Specific areas of concern include fetal safety, maternal risk, the therapeutic misconception, commercial interests, forensic/legal issues, the informed consent process, and study design. Developing guidelines that address ethical challenges and include the views and concerns of multiple stakeholders could improve the access of perinatal women to the benefits of participation in mental health research in addition to providing evidence-based mental healthcare for this subpopulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19734786      PMCID: PMC2841567          DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283318e6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0951-7367            Impact factor:   4.741


  28 in total

1.  Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.

Authors:  A M Capron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-05-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  What has a decade of Daubert wrought?

Authors:  Margaret A Berger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  National patterns of medication use during pregnancy.

Authors:  Euni Lee; Mary K Maneno; Leah Smith; Sheila R Weiss; Ilene H Zuckerman; Anthony K Wutoh; Zhenyi Xue
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists number 92, April 2008 (replaces practice bulletin number 87, November 2007). Use of psychiatric medications during pregnancy and lactation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C W Lidz; P Benson; W Winslade
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Scientific evidence in the courtroom. The death of the Frye rule.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-04-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Protecting vulnerable subjects in clinical research: children, pregnant women, prisoners, and employees.

Authors:  Karen J Schwenzer
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.258

8.  Teratogenicity of recently introduced medications in human pregnancy.

Authors:  W Y Lo; J M Friedman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Beyond parity: primary care physicians' perspectives on access to mental health care.

Authors:  Peter J Cunningham
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  ACOG committee opinion: ethical considerations in research involving women. Number 290, November 2003: Committee on Ethics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.561

View more
  3 in total

1.  Getting It "Right".

Authors:  Alinne Z Barrera; Laura B Dunn; Alexandra Nichols; Sonia Reardon; Ricardo F Muñoz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Harnessing the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) to Evaluate Medications in Pregnancy: Design Considerations.

Authors:  Kristin Palmsten; Krista F Huybrechts; Helen Mogun; Mary K Kowal; Paige L Williams; Karin B Michels; Soko Setoguchi; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Does Resolution 8430 of 1993 respond to the current needs of ethics in health research with human beings in Colombia?

Authors:  Julio Cesar Mateus; María Teresa Varela; Diana María Caicedo; Nhora Lucía Arias; Cruz Deisy Jaramillo; Liliana Cristina Morales; Gloria Inés Palma
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 0.935

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.