Literature DB >> 12488437

Removal of anti-Galalpha1,3Gal xenoantibodies with an injectable polymer.

Andreas G Katopodis1, Richard G Warner, Rudolf O Duthaler, Markus B Streiff, Armin Bruelisauer, Olivier Kretz, Birgit Dorobek, Elke Persohn, Hendrik Andres, Alain Schweitzer, Gebhard Thoma, Willy Kinzy, Valerie F J Quesniaux, Emanuele Cozzi, Hugh F S Davies, Rafael Mañez, David White.   

Abstract

Preformed and elicited Ab's against the Galalpha1,3Gal terminating carbohydrate chains (alphaGal Ab's) are the primary cause of hyperacute and acute vascular xenograft rejection in pig-to-primate transplantation. alphaGal Ab's are produced by long-lived Ab-producing cells that are not susceptible to pharmacological immunosuppression. We reasoned that antigen-specific elimination of alphaGal Ab's might be achieved in vivo by systemic administration of nonimmunogenic polyvalent alphaGal structures with high avidity for alphaGal Ab's. We devised GAS914, a soluble trisaccharide-polylysine conjugate of approximately 500 kDa that effectively competes for alphaGal binding by alphaGal IgM (IC(50), 43 nM) and IgG (IC(50), 28 nM) in vitro. Injections of GAS914 in cynomolgus monkeys, at the dose of 1 mg/kg, resulted in the immediate decrease of more than 90% of circulating alphaGal Ab's and serum anti-pig cytotoxicity. In baboons, repeated injections of GAS914 effectively reduced both circulating alphaGal Ab's and cytotoxicity over several months. Studies with [(14)C]GAS914 in rhesus monkeys and Gal(-/-) mice indicate that GAS914 binds to circulating alphaGal Ab's and that the complex is quickly metabolized by the liver and excreted by the kidney. Remarkably, posttreatment alphaGal Ab titers never exceeded pretreatment levels and no sensitization to either alphaGal or the polylysine backbone has been observed. Furthermore there was no apparent acute or chronic toxicity associated with GAS914 treatment in primates. We conclude that GAS914 may be used therapeutically for the specific removal of alphaGal Ab's.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12488437      PMCID: PMC151655          DOI: 10.1172/JCI16526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  32 in total

1.  The role of T cell help in the production of antibodies specific for Gal alpha 1-3Gal.

Authors:  Nathalie Cretin; Jennifer Bracy; Krista Hanson; John Iacomini
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Nanomolar E-selectin inhibitors: 700-fold potentiation of affinity by multivalent ligand presentation.

Authors:  G Thoma; R O Duthaler; J L Magnani; J T Patton
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-10-17       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Analysis of the control of the anti-gal immune response in a non-human primate by galactose alpha1-3 galactose trisaccharide-polyethylene glycol conjugate.

Authors:  Lisa E Diamond; Guerard W Byrne; Alexander Schwarz; Thomas A Davis; David H Adams; John S Logan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  The role of anti-Galalpha1-3Gal antibodies in acute vascular rejection and accommodation of xenografts.

Authors:  S S Lin; M J Hanaway; G V Gonzalez-Stawinski; C L Lau; W Parker; R D Davis; G W Byrne; L E Diamond; J S Logan; J L Platt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Intravenous synthetic alphaGal saccharides delay hyperacute rejection following pig-to-baboon heart transplantation.

Authors:  E Romano; F A Neethling; K Nilsson; S Kosanke; A Shimizu; S Magnusson; L Svensson; B Samuelsson; D K Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.907

6.  Depletion of anti-gal antibodies in baboons by intravenous therapy with bovine serum albumin conjugated to gal oligosaccharides.

Authors:  K Teranishi; B Gollackner; L Bühler; C Knosalla; L Correa; J D Down; M E White-Scharf; D H Sachs; M Awwad; D K C Cooper
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Differential immune responses to alpha-gal epitopes on xenografts and allografts: implications for accommodation in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  M Tanemura; D Yin; A S Chong; U Galili
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Anti-Galalpha1-3Gal antibody levels in organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  S Gojo; A Bartholomew; Y Xu; F A Neethling; M Awwad; S Saidman; A B Cosimi; D K Cooper
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Production of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning.

Authors:  Liangxue Lai; Donna Kolber-Simonds; Kwang-Wook Park; Hee-Tae Cheong; Julia L Greenstein; Gi-Sun Im; Melissa Samuel; Aaron Bonk; August Rieke; Billy N Day; Clifton N Murphy; David B Carter; Robert J Hawley; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Improvement in human decay accelerating factor transgenic porcine kidney xenograft rejection with intravenous administration of gas914, a polymeric form of alphaGAL.

Authors:  Robert Zhong; Yigang Luo; Hongji Yang; Bertha Garcia; Anand Ghanekar; Patrick Luke; Subrata Chakrabarti; Ginette Lajoie; M James Phillips; Andreas G Katopodis; Rudolf O Duthaler; Mark Cattral; William Wall; Anthony Jevnikar; Michele Bailey; Gary A Levy; David R Grant
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Antibody-mediated xenograft injury: mechanisms and protective strategies.

Authors:  Richard N Pierson
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 1.708

2.  Identification of the tetraspanin CD82 as a new barrier to xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Soad M Saleh; Ranjit S Parhar; Reem S Al-Hejailan; Razan H Bakheet; Hala S Khaleel; Hanif G Khalak; Anason S Halees; Marya Z Zaidi; Brian F Meyer; Gisella P Yung; Jörg D Seebach; Walter Conca; Khalid S Khabar; Kate S Collison; Futwan A Al-Mohanna
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Anti-non-Gal-specific combination treatment with an anti-idiotypic Ab and an inhibitory small molecule mitigates the xenoantibody response.

Authors:  John M Stewart; Alice F Tarantal; Yan Chen; Nancy C Appleby; Tania I Fuentes; C Chang I Lee; Evelyn J Salvaris; Anthony J F d'Apice; Peter J Cowan; Mary Kearns-Jonker
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 4.  Immunological challenges and therapies in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Marta Vadori; Emanuele Cozzi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  Infection barriers to successful xenotransplantation focusing on porcine endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Joachim Denner; Ralf R Tönjes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Selective in vivo removal of pathogenic anti-MAG autoantibodies, an antigen-specific treatment option for anti-MAG neuropathy.

Authors:  Ruben Herrendorff; Pascal Hänggi; Hélène Pfister; Fan Yang; Delphine Demeestere; Fabienne Hunziker; Samuel Frey; Nicole Schaeren-Wiemers; Andreas J Steck; Beat Ernst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Barriers to the successful treatment of liver disease by hepatocyte transplantation.

Authors:  Kyle A Soltys; Alejandro Soto-Gutiérrez; Masaki Nagaya; Kevin M Baskin; Melvin Deutsch; Ryotaro Ito; Benjamin L Shneider; Robert Squires; Jerry Vockley; Chandan Guha; Jayanta Roy-Chowdhury; Stephen C Strom; Jeffrey L Platt; Ira J Fox
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  Proteomic identification of non-Gal antibody targets after pig-to-primate cardiac xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Guerard W Byrne; Paul G Stalboerger; Eduardo Davila; Carrie J Heppelmann; Mozammel H Gazi; Hugh C J McGregor; Peter T LaBreche; William R Davies; Vinay P Rao; Keiji Oi; Henry D Tazelaar; John S Logan; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.907

9.  Effect of hyperkalemia and hemolysis caused by hyperacute rejection on cardiac function in pig to human ex vivo xenogeneic cardiac perfusion model.

Authors:  Jun Seok Kim; Hak-Mo Lee; Byoung Chol Oh; Hong-Gook Lim; Jeong Ryul Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Similarities in the immunoglobulin response and VH gene usage in rhesus monkeys and humans exposed to porcine hepatocytes.

Authors:  Joanne L Zahorsky-Reeves; Clare R Gregory; Donald V Cramer; Insiyyah Y Patanwala; Andrew E Kyles; Dominic C Borie; Mary K Kearns-Jonker
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.