Literature DB >> 11792992

Depletion of anti-gal antibodies in baboons by intravenous therapy with bovine serum albumin conjugated to gal oligosaccharides.

K Teranishi1, B Gollackner, L Bühler, C Knosalla, L Correa, J D Down, M E White-Scharf, D H Sachs, M Awwad, D K C Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-Galalpha 1-3Gal (Gal) antibodies (Ab) play a key role in the rejection of pig cells or organs transplanted into primates. A course of extracorporeal immunoadsorption (EIA) of anti-Gal Ab using an immunoaffinity column of a Gal type 6 oligosaccharide depletes Ab successfully, but Ab returns during the next few days. Although therapy with an anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) prevents an induced Ab response to Gal or non-Gal epitopes, T cell-independent natural anti-Gal IgM and IgG return to baseline (pretransplant) levels. We have investigated the capacity of continuous i.v. infusion of bovine serum albumin conjugated to Gal type 6 oligosaccharide (BSA-Gal) to deplete or maintain depletion of circulating anti-Gal Ab.
METHODS: Porcine peripheral blood mobilized progenitor cells (PBPC) obtained by leukapheresis from MHC-inbred miniature swine (n=6) were transplanted into baboons. Group 1 baboons (n=4) underwent whole body (300 cGy) and thymic (700 cGy) irradiation, T cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin, complement depletion with cobra venom factor, short courses of anti-CD154 mAb therapy (20 mg/kg i.v. on alternate days), cyclosporine (CyA) (in two baboons only), mycophenolate mofetil, and porcine hematopoietic growth factors. Anti-Gal Ab depletion by EIA was carried out before transplantation of high doses (2-4x 1010 cells/kg) of PBPC. Group 2 baboons (n=3) received the group 1 regimen (including CyA) plus a continuous i.v. infusion of BSA-Gal. To prevent sensitization to BSA, anti-CD154 mAb therapy was continued until BSA-Gal administration was discontinued.
RESULTS: In group 1, Gal-reactive Ab returned to pre-PBPC transplant levels within 15-21 days, but no induced Ab to Gal or non-Gal determinants developed while anti-CD154 mAb therapy was being administered. In group 2, anti-Gal Ab was either not measurable or minimally measurable while BSA-Gal was being administered. After discontinuation of BSA-Gal, Ab did not return to pre-PBPC transplant level for more than 40-60 days, and no sensitization developed even when all therapy was discontinued. In one baboon, however, Ab to Gal type 2, but not type 6, returned during BSA-Gal therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of the induced humoral response to Gal and non-Gal epitopes by anti-CD154 mAb therapy has been reported previously by our group, but our studies are the first to demonstrate a therapy that resulted in an absence of natural anti-Gal Ab for a prolonged period. The combination of BSA-Gal and T cell costimulatory blockade may facilitate survival of pig cells and organs transplanted into primates. The return in one baboon of Ab reactive with the Gal type 2 oligosaccharide, but not type 6, indicates some polymorphism of anti-Gal Ab and suggests that, to be effective in all cases, the infusion of a combination of type 6 and type 2 BSA-Gal may be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11792992     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200201150-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Xenotransplantation: where are we today?

Authors:  M D Dooldeniya; A N Warrens
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Removal of anti-Galalpha1,3Gal xenoantibodies with an injectable polymer.

Authors:  Andreas G Katopodis; Richard G Warner; Rudolf O Duthaler; Markus B Streiff; Armin Bruelisauer; Olivier Kretz; Birgit Dorobek; Elke Persohn; Hendrik Andres; Alain Schweitzer; Gebhard Thoma; Willy Kinzy; Valerie F J Quesniaux; Emanuele Cozzi; Hugh F S Davies; Rafael Mañez; David White
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Achieving tolerance in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation: reality or fantasy.

Authors:  David H Sachs; Megan Sykes; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.708

Review 4.  Modifying the sugar icing on the transplantation cake.

Authors:  David K C Cooper
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.313

Review 5.  Porcine to Human Heart Transplantation: Is Clinical Application Now Appropriate?

Authors:  Christopher G A McGregor; Guerard W Byrne
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.818

6.  Similarities in the immunoglobulin response and VH gene usage in rhesus monkeys and humans exposed to porcine hepatocytes.

Authors:  Joanne L Zahorsky-Reeves; Clare R Gregory; Donald V Cramer; Insiyyah Y Patanwala; Andrew E Kyles; Dominic C Borie; Mary K Kearns-Jonker
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.