Literature DB >> 12484754

Effect of phosphorylation on the interdomain interaction of the response regulator, NarL.

Aimee M Eldridge1, Hyun-Seo Kang, Eric Johnson, Robert Gunsalus, Frederick W Dahlquist.   

Abstract

DNA binding by the effector domain (NarLC) of the response regulator, NarL, is modulated by the phosphorylation state of the receiver domain (NarLN). The receiver domain appears to block the site of DNA binding in the nonphosphorylated state. Phosphorylation is proposed to disrupt this interaction, causing the effector domain to be released and free to bind DNA (Baikalov, I., Schroder, I., Kaczor-Grzeskowiak, M., Grzeskowiak, K., Gunsalus, R. P., and Dickerson, R. E. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 11053-61). To better understand this modulation, we analyzed the interaction between the two domains in the absence of a polypeptide linkage. Using multidimensional NMR, we mapped chemical shift changes that occurred during a titration between the two isolated domains. Specific residues in NarLC exhibit large chemical shift changes upon the addition of NarLN. These residues are primarily at the interface between the two domains as seen in the crystal structure. Using the residues with the largest chemical shift changes, we observed a dissociation constant of 88 +/- 7 microM. In the presence of 10 mM MgCl(2), the affinity is reduced 4-fold to about 350 microM. This work shows that the domains interact in trans and that this interaction, while fairly weak, provides a way to monitor the energetics of domain-domain interaction in this system. Phosphorylation of NarLN by a small-molecule phosphate donor, phosphoramidate, decreases this interaction about 25-fold from the nonphosphorylated sample. The results support the model that the mechanism of activation of NarL involves a disruption of the interdomain interface and suggests that the linker is not necessary for the transmission of signal across the domain interface. The linker does play a role in increasing the local concentration of the domains and therefore increasing the amount of closed conformation with respect to the open conformation. We estimate the levels of open conformation to be low (about 1%) in the nonphosphorylated state in the absence of magnesium ion and much higher in the phospho state (near 50%). This modulation of the open or active state via the interaction at the interface may also be applicable to other multidomain response regulator proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12484754     DOI: 10.1021/bi026254+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  16 in total

1.  Quantitative relation between intermolecular and intramolecular binding of pro-rich peptides to SH3 domains.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Characterization of the transcriptional activators SalA and SyrF, Which are required for syringomycin and syringopeptin production by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Shi-En Lu; Angela R Records; Dennis C Gross
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Structural basis of photosensitivity in a bacterial light-oxygen-voltage/helix-turn-helix (LOV-HTH) DNA-binding protein.

Authors:  Abigail I Nash; Reginald McNulty; Mary Elizabeth Shillito; Trevor E Swartz; Roberto A Bogomolni; Hartmut Luecke; Kevin H Gardner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sensor-response regulator interactions in a cross-regulated signal transduction network.

Authors:  TuAnh Ngoc Huynh; Li-Ling Chen; Valley Stewart
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Allosteric activation of bacterial response regulators: the role of the cognate histidine kinase beyond phosphorylation.

Authors:  Felipe Trajtenberg; Daniela Albanesi; Natalia Ruétalo; Horacio Botti; Ariel E Mechaly; Marcos Nieves; Pablo S Aguilar; Larisa Cybulski; Nicole Larrieux; Diego de Mendoza; Alejandro Buschiazzo
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  NMR structure of the pseudo-receiver domain of CikA.

Authors:  Tiyu Gao; Xiaofan Zhang; Natalia B Ivleva; Susan S Golden; Andy LiWang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  A DNA-assisted binding assay for weak protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Katherine E Frato; Robert F Schleif
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Structural analysis and solution studies of the activated regulatory domain of the response regulator ArcA: a symmetric dimer mediated by the alpha4-beta5-alpha5 face.

Authors:  Alejandro Toro-Roman; Timothy R Mack; Ann M Stock
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Structural analysis of the domain interface in DrrB, a response regulator of the OmpR/PhoB subfamily.

Authors:  Victoria L Robinson; Ti Wu; Ann M Stock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Functional roles for the GerE-family carboxyl-terminal domains of nitrate response regulators NarL and NarP of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Alice V Lin; Valley Stewart
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.