Literature DB >> 12837793

Structural analysis of the domain interface in DrrB, a response regulator of the OmpR/PhoB subfamily.

Victoria L Robinson1, Ti Wu, Ann M Stock.   

Abstract

The N-terminal regulatory domains of bacterial response regulator proteins catalyze phosphoryl transfer and function as phosphorylation-dependent regulatory switches to control the output activities of C-terminal effector domains. Structures of numerous isolated regulatory and effector domains have been determined. However, a detailed understanding of regulatory interactions among these domains has been limited by the relative paucity of structural data for intact multidomain response regulator proteins. The first multidomain structures determined, those of transcription factor NarL and methylesterase CheB, both revealed extensive interdomain interfaces. The regulatory domains obstruct access to the functional sites of the effector domains, indicating a regulatory mechanism based on inhibition. In contrast, the recently determined structure of the OmpR/PhoB homologue DrrD revealed no significant interdomain interface, suggesting that the domains are tethered by a flexible linker and lack a fixed orientation relative to each other. To address the generality of this feature, we have determined the 1.8-A resolution crystal structure of Thermotoga maritima DrrB, providing a second structure of a multidomain response regulator of the OmpR/PhoB subfamily. The structure reveals an extensive domain interface of 751 A(2) and therefore differs greatly from that observed in DrrD. Residues that are crucial players in defining the activation state of the regulatory domain contribute to this interface, implying that conformational changes associated with phosphorylation will influence these intramolecular contacts. The DrrB and DrrD structures are suggestive of different signaling mechanisms, with intramolecular communication between N- and C-terminal domains making substantially different contributions to effector domain regulation in individual members of the OmpR/PhoB family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12837793      PMCID: PMC164896          DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.14.4186-4194.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  44 in total

1.  C-terminal DNA binding stimulates N-terminal phosphorylation of the outer membrane protein regulator OmpR from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S K Ames; N Frankema; L J Kenney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Molecular characterization of the PmrA regulon.

Authors:  M M Wösten; E A Groisman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Structural comparison of the PhoB and OmpR DNA-binding/transactivation domains and the arrangement of PhoB molecules on the phosphate box.

Authors:  H Okamura; S Hanaoka; A Nagadoi; K Makino; Y Nishimura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  The unphosphorylated receiver domain of PhoB silences the activity of its output domain.

Authors:  D W Ellison; W R McCleary
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  A tale of two components: a novel kinase and a regulatory switch.

Authors:  V L Robinson; D R Buckler; A M Stock
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-08

Review 6.  Histidine kinases and response regulator proteins in two-component signaling systems.

Authors:  A H West; A M Stock
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement.

Authors:  A Perrakis; R Morris; V S Lamzin
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-05

8.  Evidence for lateral gene transfer between Archaea and bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima.

Authors:  K E Nelson; R A Clayton; S R Gill; M L Gwinn; R J Dodson; D H Haft; E K Hickey; J D Peterson; W C Nelson; K A Ketchum; L McDonald; T R Utterback; J A Malek; K D Linher; M M Garrett; A M Stewart; M D Cotton; M S Pratt; C A Phillips; D Richardson; J Heidelberg; G G Sutton; R D Fleischmann; J A Eisen; O White; S L Salzberg; H O Smith; J C Venter; C M Fraser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Multimerization of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated ArcA is necessary for the response regulator function of the Arc two-component signal transduction system.

Authors:  Y Jeon; Y S Lee; J S Han; J B Kim; D S Hwang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-08-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  The guanine nucleotide-binding switch in three dimensions.

Authors:  I R Vetter; A Wittinghofer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  49 in total

1.  Structure of the response regulator PhoP from Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals a dimer through the receiver domain.

Authors:  Smita Menon; Shuishu Wang
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Transcriptional activation by Bacillus subtilis ResD: tandem binding to target elements and phosphorylation-dependent and -independent transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Hao Geng; Shunji Nakano; Michiko M Nakano
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Crystal structure of the response regulator 02 receiver domain, the essential YycF two-component system of Streptococcus pneumoniae in both complexed and native states.

Authors:  Colin J Bent; Neil W Isaacs; Timothy J Mitchell; Alan Riboldi-Tunnicliffe
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Domain structure of virulence-associated response regulator PhoP of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: role of the linker region in regulator-promoter interaction(s).

Authors:  Anuj Pathak; Rajni Goyal; Akesh Sinha; Dibyendu Sarkar
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Binding of cyclic diguanylate in the non-catalytic EAL domain of FimX induces a long-range conformational change.

Authors:  Yaning Qi; Mary Lay Cheng Chuah; Xueming Dong; Kailing Xie; Zhen Luo; Kai Tang; Zhao-Xun Liang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Activation of the global gene regulator PrrA (RegA) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  Cédric Laguri; Rachelle A Stenzel; Timothy J Donohue; Mary K Phillips-Jones; Michael P Williamson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Structural classification of bacterial response regulators: diversity of output domains and domain combinations.

Authors:  Michael Y Galperin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Structural Alteration of OmpR as a Source of Ertapenem Resistance in a CTX-M-15-Producing Escherichia coli O25b:H4 Sequence Type 131 Clinical Isolate.

Authors:  Hervé Dupont; Pascaline Choinier; David Roche; Sandine Adiba; Megan Sookdeb; Catherine Branger; Erick Denamur; Hedi Mammeri
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Quorum-sensing based bacteriocin production is down-regulated by N-terminally truncated species of gene activators.

Authors:  Daniel Straume; Morten Kjos; Ingolf F Nes; Dzung B Diep
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  The receiver domain of hybrid histidine kinase VirA: an enhancing factor for vir gene expression in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  Arlene A Wise; Fang Fang; Yi-Han Lin; Fanglian He; David G Lynn; Andrew N Binns
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.