Literature DB >> 12482088

Orthogonal polynomial regression for the detection of response variability in event-related fMRI.

Vincent P Clark1.   

Abstract

Previous studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) have identified a variety of brain regions that respond to rare nontarget distractor stimuli presented in the visual oddball task. By contrast, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (ER-fMRI) studies using similar stimuli have found little or no response in these same regions, suggesting that ER-fMRI may be less sensitive than ERPs for detecting stimulus-evoked activity. It was hypothesized here that variations in ER-fMRI response amplitude evoked by successive stimuli may have reduced detection sensitivity in these previous studies. Multiple regression with orthogonal polynomials (OPR) was used to increase detection sensitivity by employing orthogonal polynomial equations to model such variations in response amplitude. ER-fMRI data was collected from 17 subjects during performance of the visual oddball task, which included frequent nontarget, rare nontarget distractor, and rare target block letter stimuli, to which subjects made a speeded button press response. When compared with multiple regression using main effect regressors alone, OPR identified an increased volume of significant target and distractor evoked main effect response due to reduced error variance. In addition, distractor-evoked activity was found to correlate with orthogonal polynomial regressors but not main effect regressors across a large volume of prefrontal and paralimbic brain regions including dorsal-lateral prefrontal, inferior-lateral prefrontal, and cingulate cortex. These results illustrate that considerable variability is present in ER-fMRI responses evoked by rare distractor stimuli in the oddball task. Such variability can be modeled using OPR, leading to increased detection sensitivity and better anatomical correspondence between the findings of ER-fMRI and ERP studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12482088     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Modeling dose-dependent neural processing responses using mixed effects spline models: with application to a PET study of ethanol.

Authors:  Ying Guo; F DuBois Bowman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Involvement of the dorsal and ventral attention networks in oddball stimulus processing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Brain networks shaping religious belief.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Frank Krueger; Matthew P Thornburg; Jordan Henry Grafman
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-01-15

4.  Estimation and Classification of BOLD Responses Over Multiple Trials.

Authors:  Kush Kapur; Anindya Roy; Dulal K Bhaumik; Robert D Gibbons; Nicole A Lazar; John A Sweeney; Subhash Aryal; Dave Patterson
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 0.893

5.  Art for reward's sake: visual art recruits the ventral striatum.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Henrik Hagtvedt; Vanessa M Patrick; Amy Anderson; Randall Stilla; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Xiaoping Hu; João R Sato; Srinivas Reddy; K Sathian
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Permutation testing of orthogonal factorial effects in a language-processing experiment using fMRI.

Authors:  John Suckling; Matthew H Davis; Cinly Ooi; Alle Meije Wink; Jalal Fadili; Raymond Salvador; David Welchew; Levent Sendur; Vochita Maxim; Edward T Bullmore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Mixed-effects multilevel analysis followed by canonical correlation analysis is an effective fMRI tool for the investigation of idiosyncrasies.

Authors:  Sungman Jo; Hyun-Chul Kim; Niv Lustig; Gang Chen; Jong-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Measuring case severity: a novel tool for benchmarking and clinical documentation improvement.

Authors:  Jie Xiang; Paul W Durance; Louisa C Griffes; Yalei Chen; Rishi R Bakshi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.908

9.  Reduced fMRI activity predicts relapse in patients recovering from stimulant dependence.

Authors:  Vincent P Clark; Gregory K Beatty; Robert E Anderson; Piyadassa Kodituwakku; John P Phillips; Terran D R Lane; Kent A Kiehl; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.