Literature DB >> 24279687

Brain networks shaping religious belief.

Dimitrios Kapogiannis1, Gopikrishna Deshpande, Frank Krueger, Matthew P Thornburg, Jordan Henry Grafman.   

Abstract

We previously demonstrated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) that religious belief depends upon three cognitive dimensions, which can be mapped to specific brain regions. In the present study, we considered these co-activated regions as nodes of three networks each one corresponding to a particular dimension, corresponding to each dimension and examined the causal flow within and between these networks to address two important hypotheses that remained untested in our previous work. First, we hypothesized that regions involved in theory of mind (ToM) are located upstream the causal flow and drive non-ToM regions, in line with theories attributing religion to the evolution of ToM. Second, we hypothesized that differences in directional connectivity are associated with differences in religiosity. To test these hypotheses, we performed a multivariate Granger causality-based directional connectivity analysis of fMRI data to demonstrate the causal flow within religious belief-related networks. Our results supported both hypotheses. Religious subjects preferentially activated a pathway from inferolateral to dorsomedial frontal cortex to monitor the intent and involvement of supernatural agents (SAs; intent-related ToM). Perception of SAs engaged pathways involved in fear regulation and affective ToM. Religious beliefs are founded both on propositional statements for doctrine, but also on episodic memory and imagery. Beliefs based on doctrine engaged a pathway from Broca's to Wernicke's language areas. Beliefs related to everyday life experiences engaged pathways involved in imagery. Beliefs implying less involved SAs and evoking imagery activated a pathway from right lateral temporal to occipital regions. This pathway was more active in non-religious compared to religious subjects, suggesting greater difficulty and procedural demands for imagining and processing the intent of SAs. Insights gained by Granger connectivity analysis inform us about the causal binding of individual regions activated during religious belief processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24279687      PMCID: PMC3929007          DOI: 10.1089/brain.2013.0172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Connect        ISSN: 2158-0014


  53 in total

1.  Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief.

Authors:  Will M Gervais; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The nexus between decision making and emotion regulation: a review of convergent neurocognitive substrates.

Authors:  Derek G V Mitchell
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Neural circuitry underlying voluntary suppression of sadness.

Authors:  Johanne Lévesque; Fanny Eugène; Yves Joanette; Vincent Paquette; Boualem Mensour; Gilles Beaudoin; Jean-Maxime Leroux; Pierre Bourgouin; Mario Beauregard
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Daniel J Levitin; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Posteromedial parietal cortical activity and inputs predict tactile spatial acuity.

Authors:  Randall Stilla; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Stephen LaConte; Xiaoping Hu; K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people's intentions versus physical causality.

Authors:  Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Assessing and compensating for zero-lag correlation effects in time-lagged Granger causality analysis of FMRI.

Authors:  Gopikrishna Deshpande; K Sathian; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Fronto-parietal regulation of media violence exposure in adolescents: a multi-method study.

Authors:  Maren Strenziok; Frank Krueger; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Rhoshel K Lenroot; Elke van der Meer; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Understanding actions of others: the electrodynamics of the left and right hemispheres. A high-density EEG neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Stephanie Ortigue; Corrado Sinigaglia; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Functional-anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing.

Authors:  Evan Chen; Page Widick; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  12 in total

1.  Dynamic brain connectivity is a better predictor of PTSD than static connectivity.

Authors:  Changfeng Jin; Hao Jia; Pradyumna Lanka; D Rangaprakash; Lingjiang Li; Tianming Liu; Xiaoping Hu; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Experimental Validation of Dynamic Granger Causality for Inferring Stimulus-Evoked Sub-100 ms Timing Differences from fMRI.

Authors:  Yunzhi Wang; Santosh Katwal; Baxter Rogers; John Gore; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Diffusion of responsibility attenuates altruistic punishment: A functional magnetic resonance imaging effective connectivity study.

Authors:  Chunliang Feng; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Chao Liu; Ruolei Gu; Yue-Jia Luo; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study.

Authors:  Kimberly Goodyear; Raja Parasuraman; Sergey Chernyak; Poornima Madhavan; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Modelling the effect of religion on human empathy based on an adaptive temporal-causal network model.

Authors:  Laila van Ments; Peter Roelofsma; Jan Treur
Journal:  Comput Soc Netw       Date:  2018-01-05

6.  Investigating the Correspondence of Clinical Diagnostic Grouping With Underlying Neurobiological and Phenotypic Clusters Using Unsupervised Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhao; D Rangaprakash; Bowen Yuan; Thomas S Denney; Jeffrey S Katz; Michael N Dretsch; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Front Appl Math Stat       Date:  2018-09-25

7.  Cognitive flexibility and religious disbelief.

Authors:  Leor Zmigrod; P Jason Rentfrow; Sharon Zmigrod; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-11

8.  Repetitive Religious Chanting Invokes Positive Emotional Schema to Counterbalance Fear: A Multi-Modal Functional and Structural MRI Study.

Authors:  Junling Gao; Stavros Skouras; Hang Kin Leung; Bonnie Wai Yan Wu; Huijun Wu; Chunqi Chang; Hin Hung Sik
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Believing and Beliefs-Neurophysiological Underpinnings.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Seitz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Investigating Focal Connectivity Deficits in Alzheimer's Disease Using Directional Brain Networks Derived from Resting-State fMRI.

Authors:  Sinan Zhao; D Rangaprakash; Archana Venkataraman; Peipeng Liang; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.