Literature DB >> 21111833

Art for reward's sake: visual art recruits the ventral striatum.

Simon Lacey1, Henrik Hagtvedt, Vanessa M Patrick, Amy Anderson, Randall Stilla, Gopikrishna Deshpande, Xiaoping Hu, João R Sato, Srinivas Reddy, K Sathian.   

Abstract

A recent study showed that people evaluate products more positively when they are physically associated with art images than similar non-art images. Neuroimaging studies of visual art have investigated artistic style and esthetic preference but not brain responses attributable specifically to the artistic status of images. Here we tested the hypothesis that the artistic status of images engages reward circuitry, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during viewing of art and non-art images matched for content. Subjects made animacy judgments in response to each image. Relative to non-art images, art images activated, on both subject- and item-wise analyses, reward-related regions: the ventral striatum, hypothalamus and orbitofrontal cortex. Neither response times nor ratings of familiarity or esthetic preference for art images correlated significantly with activity that was selective for art images, suggesting that these variables were not responsible for the art-selective activations. Investigation of effective connectivity, using time-varying, wavelet-based, correlation-purged Granger causality analyses, further showed that the ventral striatum was driven by visual cortical regions when viewing art images but not non-art images, and was not driven by regions that correlated with esthetic preference for either art or non-art images. These findings are consistent with our hypothesis, leading us to propose that the appeal of visual art involves activation of reward circuitry based on artistic status alone and independently of its hedonic value.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21111833      PMCID: PMC3031763          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

1.  Neural correlates of perceptual choice and decision making during fear-disgust discrimination.

Authors:  Axel Thielscher; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functional neuroanatomy of the perception of modern art: A DC-EEG study on the influence of stylistic information on aesthetic experience.

Authors:  Petra G Lengger; Florian Ph S Fischmeister; Helmut Leder; Herbert Bauer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference.

Authors:  Marcos Nadal; Enric Munar; Miquel Angel Capó; Jaume Rosselló; Camilo José Cela-Conde
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

4.  How neuroscience can inform consumer research.

Authors:  Peter H Kenning; Hilke Plassmann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study.

Authors:  Ulrich Kirk; Martin Skov; Mark Schram Christensen; Niels Nygaard
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Posteromedial parietal cortical activity and inputs predict tactile spatial acuity.

Authors:  Randall Stilla; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Stephen LaConte; Xiaoping Hu; K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Assessing and compensating for zero-lag correlation effects in time-lagged Granger causality analysis of FMRI.

Authors:  Gopikrishna Deshpande; K Sathian; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception.

Authors:  Camilo J Cela-Conde; Gisèle Marty; Fernando Maestú; Tomás Ortiz; Enric Munar; Alberto Fernández; Miquel Roca; Jaume Rosselló; Felipe Quesney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Reward networks in the brain as captured by connectivity measures.

Authors:  Estela Camara; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Zheng Ye; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Hypocretin/Orexin: a molecular link between sleep, energy regulation, and pleasure.

Authors:  Hooman Ganjavi; Colin M Shapiro
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.198

View more
  45 in total

1.  Metaphorically feeling: comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Randall Stilla; K Sathian
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.

Authors:  Vanessa Era; Matteo Candidi; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neurophysiological correlates of embodiment and motivational factors during the perception of virtual architectural environments.

Authors:  Giovanni Vecchiato; Andrea Jelic; Gaetano Tieri; Anton Giulio Maglione; Federico De Matteis; Fabio Babiloni
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

4.  Dynamics of brain networks in the aesthetic appreciation.

Authors:  Camilo J Cela-Conde; Juan García-Prieto; José J Ramasco; Claudio R Mirasso; Ricardo Bajo; Enric Munar; Albert Flexas; Francisco del-Pozo; Fernando Maestú
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Brain networks shaping religious belief.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Frank Krueger; Matthew P Thornburg; Jordan Henry Grafman
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-01-15

Review 6.  Investigating effective brain connectivity from fMRI data: past findings and current issues with reference to Granger causality analysis.

Authors:  Gopikrishna Deshpande; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2012

7.  Olfactory Network Differences in Master Sommeliers: Connectivity Analysis Using Granger Causality and Graph Theoretical Approach.

Authors:  Karthik Sreenivasan; Xiaowei Zhuang; Sarah J Banks; Virendra Mishra; Zhengshi Yang; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Dietmar Cordes
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Dynamic brain connectivity is a better predictor of PTSD than static connectivity.

Authors:  Changfeng Jin; Hao Jia; Pradyumna Lanka; D Rangaprakash; Lingjiang Li; Tianming Liu; Xiaoping Hu; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  TMS over the superior temporal sulcus affects expressivity evaluation of portraits.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Experimental Validation of Dynamic Granger Causality for Inferring Stimulus-Evoked Sub-100 ms Timing Differences from fMRI.

Authors:  Yunzhi Wang; Santosh Katwal; Baxter Rogers; John Gore; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.