Literature DB >> 27981354

An Assessment of Long-Term Compliance with Performance Standards in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands.

Kyle Van den Bosch1, Jeffrey W Matthews2.   

Abstract

Under the US Clean Water Act, wetland restoration is used to compensate for adverse impacts to wetlands. Following construction, compensation wetlands are monitored for approximately 5 years to determine if they comply with project-specific performance standards. Once a compensation site complies with performance standards, it is assumed that the site will continue to meet standards indefinitely. However, there have been few assessments of long-term compliance. We surveyed, in 2012, 30 compensation sites 8-20 years after restoration to determine whether projects continued to meet performance standards. Additionally, we compared floristic quality of compensation sites to the quality of adjacent natural wetlands to determine whether wetland condition in compensation sites could be predicted based on the condition of nearby wetlands. Compensation sites met, on average, 65% of standards during the final year of monitoring and 53% of standards in 2012, a significant decrease in compliance. Although forested wetlands often failed to meet standards for planted tree survival, the temporal decrease in compliance was driven by increasing dominance by invasive plants in emergent wetlands. The presumption of continued compliance with performance standards after a 5-year monitoring period was not supported. Wetlands restored near better quality natural wetlands achieved and maintained greater floristic quality, suggesting that landscape context was an important determinant of long-term restoration outcomes. Based on our findings, we recommend that compensation wetlands should be monitored for longer time periods, and we suggest that nearby or adjacent natural wetlands provide good examples of reasonably achievable restoration outcomes in a particular landscape.

Keywords:  Compliance; Floristic quality; Monitoring; Vegetation; Wetland mitigation; Wetland restoration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27981354     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0804-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  14 in total

1.  Validity of Performance Criteria and a Tentative Model for Regulatory Use in Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Permitting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Wetland mitigation compliance in the western upper peninsula of Michigan.

Authors:  Melissa M Hornyak; Kathleen E Halvorsen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Compliance with wetland mitigation standards in the upper peninsula of Michigan, USA.

Authors:  Andrew T Kozich; Kathleen E Halvorsen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Microbial community structure and denitrification in a wetland mitigation bank.

Authors:  Ariane L Peralta; Jeffrey W Matthews; Angela D Kent
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Group-based modeling of ecological trajectories in restored wetlands.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Matthews
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Matthews; Anton G Endress
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Matthews; Greg Spyreas; Anton G Endress
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Compensatory stream and wetland mitigation in North Carolina: an evaluation of regulatory success.

Authors:  Tammy Hill; Eric Kulz; Breda Munoz; John R Dorney
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Restoration of ecosystem services for environmental markets.

Authors:  Margaret A Palmer; Solange Filoso
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Urbanization and nutrient retention in freshwater riparian wetlands.

Authors:  Dianna M Hogan; Mark R Walbridge
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.657

View more
  1 in total

1.  Voluntary Restoration: Mitigation's Silent Partner in the Quest to Reverse Coastal Wetland Loss in the USA.

Authors:  Rachel K Gittman; Christopher J Baillie; Katie K Arkema; Richard O Bennett; Jeff Benoit; Seth Blitch; Julien Brun; Anthony Chatwin; Allison Colden; Alyssa Dausman; Bryan DeAngelis; Nathaniel Herold; Jessica Henkel; Rachel Houge; Ronald Howard; A Randall Hughes; Steven B Scyphers; Tisa Shostik; Ariana Sutton-Grier; Jonathan H Grabowski
Journal:  Front Mar Sci       Date:  2019-08-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.