Literature DB >> 12467291

Interaction of radiation and smoking in lung cancer induction among workers at the Mayak nuclear enterprise.

Z B Tokarskaya1, B R Scott, G V Zhuntova, N D Okladnikova, Z D Belyaeva, V F Khokhryakov, H Schöllnberger, E K Vasilenko.   

Abstract

For radiation-related cancer risk evaluation, it is important to assess not only influences of individual risk factors but also their interactive effects (e.g., additive, multiplicative, etc.). Multivariate analysis methods adapted for interactive effects allow such assessments. We have used a multivariate analysis approach to investigate the pair-wise interactions of the previously identified three main etiological factors for lung cancer induction in Russian workers of the Mayak Production Association (PA) nuclear enterprise. These three factors are as follows: (1) body burden of inhaled plutonium-239 (239Pu), an influence on absorbed alpha-radiation dose; (2) cumulative, absorbed external gamma-radiation dose to the lung; and (3) level of cigarette smoking as indicated by a smoking index (SI). The SI represents the cigarettes smoked per day times years smoking. The Mayak PA workers were exposed by inhalation to both soluble and insoluble forms of 239Pu. Based on a cohort of 4,390 persons (77% male), we conducted a nested, case-control study of lung cancer induction using 486 matched cases and controls. Each case was matched to two controls. Matching was based on five factors: sex, year of birth, year work began, profession, and workplace. Three levels of smoking were considered: low (SI = 1 to 499), used as a reference level; middle (SI = 500 to 900); and high (SI = 901 to 2,000). For lung cancer induction, a supra-multiplicative effect was demonstrated for high external gamma-ray doses (> 2.0 Gy) plus high 239Pu intakes (body burden >2.3 kBq). This observation is consistent with the hypothesis of curvilinear dose-response relationships for lung cancer induction by high- and low-LET radiations. The interaction between radiation (external gamma rays or 239Pu body burden) and cigarette smoke was found to depend on the smoking level. For the middle level of smoking in combination with gamma radiation (> 2.0 Gy) or 239Pu body burden (> 2.3 kBq), results were consistent with additive effects. However, for the high level of smoking in combination with gamma radiation (> 2.0 Gy) or 239Pu body burden (> 2.3 kBq), results were consistent with the occurrence of multiplicative effects. These results indicate that low-dose risk estimates for radiation-induced lung cancer derived without adjusting for the influence of cigarette smoking could be greatly overestimated. Further, such systematic error may considerably distort the shape of the risk vs. dose curve and could possibly obscure the presence of a dose threshold for radiation-induced lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12467291     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200212000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  12 in total

1.  Radiation risk of screening with low dose CT.

Authors:  R L Karadi
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

4.  Implications of Recent Epidemiological Studies for Compensation of Veterans Exposed to Plutonium.

Authors:  Jan Beyea
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.922

5.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Lung, liver and bone cancer mortality in Mayak workers.

Authors:  Mikhail E Sokolnikov; Ethel S Gilbert; Dale L Preston; Elaine Ron; Natalia S Shilnikova; Victor V Khokhryakov; Evgeny K Vasilenko; Nina A Koshurnikova
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Low-dose-radiation stimulated natural chemical and biological protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Lung cancer risks from plutonium: an updated analysis of data from the Mayak worker cohort.

Authors:  E S Gilbert; M E Sokolnikov; D L Preston; S J Schonfeld; A E Schadilov; E K Vasilenko; N A Koshurnikova
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Low-dose radiation and genotoxic chemicals can protect against stochastic biological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Vernon E Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

10.  A novel prognostic model predicts overall survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on clinical features and blood biomarkers.

Authors:  Changchun Lai; Chunning Zhang; Hualiang Lv; Hanqing Huang; Xia Ke; Chuchan Zhou; Hao Chen; Shulin Chen; Lei Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.