Literature DB >> 12464707

Which central dual X-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis?

Ronald C Hamdy, Steven M Petak, Leon Lenchik.   

Abstract

Although central measurement of bone mass by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is viewed by many as the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients without previous fragility fracture, controversy remains on how best to use central DXA as a tool for diagnosis. Questions concerning the measurement of bone mass of the central skeleton were addressed at the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference. An expert panel agreed on the following positions: First, the diagnosis of osteoporosis should be based on the lowest T-score of either the PA spine or hip. Second, both the PA spine and hip should be measured. Third, whenever possible, bone mineral density (BMD) of the first four lumbar vertebrae should be measured. Fourth, DXA manufacturers should use L1-L4 as the default region of interest for their printouts. Fifth, BMD of either hip may be measured. Sixth, the lowest T-score of the three sites total hip, femoral neck, or trochanter should be considered. Seventh, Ward's area should not be used for diagnostic purposes; DXA manufacturers should not include this region in the default printout. Eighth, BMD of the forearm should be measured if the hip or spine cannot be accurately measured. Finally, lateral spine BMD should not be used to diagnose osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12464707     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:5:3s:s11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  25 in total

1.  Differences between the right and the left foot in calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Aydan Oral; Ayşe Yaliman; Dilşad Sindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Performance of four clinical screening tools to select peri- and early postmenopausal women for dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Rud; J E B Jensen; L Mosekilde; S P Nielsen; J Hilden; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Patient variables impact lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry precision.

Authors:  R D Blank; D G Malone; R C Christian; N L Vallarta-Ast; D C Krueger; M K Drezner; N C Binkley; K E Hansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  What analytic method should clinicians use to derive spine T-scores and predict incident fractures in men? Results from the MrOS study.

Authors:  K E Hansen; R D Blank; L Palermo; H A Fink; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Dongil Choi; Deog-Yoon Kim; Chung Soo Han; Seonwoo Kim; Hae Sook Bok; Wooseong Huh; Jae-Wook Ko; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Update on bone density testing.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Clinical performance of seven prescreening tools for osteoporosis in Iranian postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Abbas Keshtkar; Omidreza Tabatabaie; Nassim Matin; Zahra Mohammadi; Mehdi Ebrahimi; Patricia Khashayar; Mojgan Asadi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 8.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 9.  Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Prevalence of osteoporosis in men and determinants of changes in bone mass in a non-selected Spanish population.

Authors:  M Naves; J B Díaz-López; C Gómez; A Rodríguez-Rebollar; M Serrano-Arias; J B Cannata-Andía
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.