Literature DB >> 10777984

Reliability and validity of women's recall of mammographic screening.

A Barratt1, J Cockburn, D Smith, S Redman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of self-reported attendance for mammographic screening.
METHODS: To assess reliability of recall of attendance for a screening mammogram, 100 women selected at random were interviewed twice (approximately one week apart). To assess validity, 127 women who reported having a mammogram within the national breast screening program (BreastScreen Australia) consented to having their reports verified by the national program.
RESULTS: Test-retest reliability for the question "Have you ever had a mammogram?" was perfect (agreement 100%, kappa 1). Validity was also high. About one-quarter of women (24.4%) recalled the exact date of their last mammogram and a further third (39.4%) correctly reported the month in which the mammogram was done. Almost all (91.3%) women reported the mammogram date accurately to within 12 months of the recorded date.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that Australian women provide reliable and valid information in relation to mammographic screening attendance. IMPLICATIONS: Self-reported data about attendance for mammographic screening are likely to provide reliable and valid estimates for research and health services evaluation purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10777984     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00728.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  12 in total

1.  Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Alexandra L Barratt; Elizabeth Davey; Phyllis N Butow; Sally Redman; Nehmat Houssami; Glenn P Salkeld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Reliability of self-reported diagnostic radiation history in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Anouk Pijpe; Peggy Manders; Renée L Mulder; Flora E van Leeuwen; Matti A Rookus
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Nativity status and mammography use: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Tiffany M Billmeier; Florence J Dallo
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-10

4.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Moving beyond the typologies of managed care: the example of health plan predictors of screening mammography.

Authors:  Sherilyn Tye; Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Public Opinions about Overdiagnosis: A National Community Survey.

Authors:  Ray Moynihan; Brooke Nickel; Jolyn Hersch; Elaine Beller; Jenny Doust; Shane Compton; Alexandra Barratt; Lisa Bero; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program: challenges for survey methods.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Gennaro Esposito; Silvia Brezzi; Angela Brachini; Patrizio Raggi; Antonio Federici
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Inconsistent self-reported mammography history: findings from the National Population Health Survey longitudinal cohort.

Authors:  Christina M Bancej; Colleen J Maxwell; Judy Snider
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women's decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jolyn Hersch; Alexandra Barratt; Jesse Jansen; Nehmat Houssami; Les Irwig; Gemma Jacklyn; Haryana Dhillon; Hazel Thornton; Kevin McGeechan; Kirsten Howard; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.