Literature DB >> 12456436

A comparison of patient state index and bispectral index values during the perioperative period.

Xiaoguang Chen1, Jun Tang, Paul F White, Ronald H Wender, Hong Ma, Alexander Sloninsky, Robert Kariger.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The patient state index (PSI), a quantitative electroencephalographic index, has been recently introduced into clinical practice as a monitor for assessing consciousness during sedation and general anesthesia. We designed this observational study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the PSI with that of the bispectral index (BIS) with respect to their ability to predict the loss of consciousness and emergence from anesthesia, as well as to assess changes in IV (propofol) and inhaled (desflurane) anesthetics during the maintenance period. Twenty consenting patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgical procedures were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg IV and fentanyl 1 micro g/kg IV, and tracheal intubation was facilitated with cisatracurium 0.3 mg/kg IV. Desflurane 4% in combination with nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen was administered for the maintenance of anesthesia. Comparative PSI and BIS values were obtained at specific time intervals during the induction, maintenance, and emergence periods. The changes in these indices were recorded after the administration of propofol (20 mg IV) or with 2% increases or decreases in the inspired concentration of desflurane during the maintenance period. With logistic regression models, both the BIS and PSI were found to be effective as predictors of unconsciousness (i.e., failed to respond to verbal stimuli) (P < 0.01). The PSI also correlated with the BIS during both the induction of (r = 0.78) and emergence from (r = 0.73) general anesthesia. However, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of consciousness indicated a better performance with the PSI (0.95 +/- 0.04) than the BIS (0.79 +/- 0.04). During the maintenance period, the PSI values were comparable to the BIS in response to changes in propofol and desflurane but displayed greater interpatient variability. Finally, the PSI (versus BIS) values were less interfered with by the electrocautery unit during surgery (16% versus 65%, respectively). In conclusion, the PSI may prove to be a viable alternative to the BIS for evaluating consciousness during the induction of and emergence from general anesthesia, as well as for titrating the administration of propofol and desflurane during the maintenance period. However, further studies with the PSA device are needed to determine its role in anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: The patient state index could be a useful alternative to the bispectral index for assessing level of consciousness during the induction of and emergence from anesthesia, as well as for titrating IV and volatile anesthetics during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12456436     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  19 in total

Review 1.  Using EEG to monitor anesthesia drug effects during surgery.

Authors:  Leslie C Jameson; Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Comparison of electrophysiologic monitors with clinical assessment of level of sedation.

Authors:  Christopher J Chisholm; Joseph Zurica; Dmitry Mironov; Robert R Sciacca; Eugene Ornstein; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  [Measurement of the depth of anaesthesia].

Authors:  G N Schmidt; J Müller; P Bischoff
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Evaluation of the SEDline to improve the safety and efficiency of conscious sedation.

Authors:  Thomas D Caputo; Michael A E Ramsay; Jeffrey A Rossmann; M Miles Beach; Garth R Griffiths; Benjamin Meyrat; James B Barnes; David G Kerns; Brad Crump; Barnett Bookatz; Paul Ezzo
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2011-07

5.  The Patient State Index is well balanced for propofol sedation.

Authors:  K H Lee; Y H Kim; Y J Sung; M K Oh
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Use of the Patient State Index (PSI) to assist in the diagnosis of perioperative neurological injury and brain death.

Authors:  Eric Jacobsohn; Charl De Wet; Heidi Tymkew; Laureen Hill; Michael Avidan; Nat Levy; Stephanie Bruemmer-Smith
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Processed Electroencephalogram Monitoring and Postoperative Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristen K MacKenzie; Angelitta M Britt-Spells; Laura P Sands; Jacqueline M Leung
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Sedation in adults receiving mechanical ventilation: physiological and comfort outcomes.

Authors:  Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Paul A Wetzel; Al M Best; Jessica M Ketchum; V Anne Hamilton; Nyimas Y Arief; Rita Pickler; Curtis N Sessler
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Bispectral index monitor: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-06-01

10.  Propofol and non-propofol based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy-prospective comparison of depth of sedation using an EEG based SEDLine monitor.

Authors:  Basavana Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh; Gowri Gouda; Anuradha Borle; Augustus Carlin; Avantika Yadwad
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.