Literature DB >> 26364193

Propofol and non-propofol based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy-prospective comparison of depth of sedation using an EEG based SEDLine monitor.

Basavana Goudra1, Preet Mohinder Singh2, Gowri Gouda3, Anuradha Borle2, Augustus Carlin4, Avantika Yadwad4.   

Abstract

Propofol is a popular anesthetic sedative employed in colonoscopy. It is known to increase the patient satisfaction and improve throughput. However, there are concerns among the clinicians with regard to the depth of sedation, as a deeper degree of sedation is known to increase the incidence of aspiration and other adverse events. So we planned to compare the depth of sedation between propofol and non-propofol based sedation in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy, as measured by an electroencephalogram (EEG) based monitor SEDLine monitor (SedlineInc., San Diego, CA). The non-randomized prospective observational study was performed in the outpatient gastroenterology suite of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Patients included ASA class I-III aged more than 18 years scheduled for colonoscopy under Propofol or non-propofol based sedation. After an institutional review board approval, a written consent was obtained from prospective patients. Sedation (propofol or non-propofol based) was administered by either a certified nurse anesthetist under the supervision of an anesthesiologist (propofol) or a registered endoscopy nurse under the guidance of the endoscopist performing the procedure (non-propofol sedation). Depth of sedation was measured with an EEG based SEDLine monitor. The sedation providers were blinded to the patient state index-the indicator of depth of sedation. PSI (patient state index-SEDLine reading) was documented at colonoscope insertion, removal and at the return of verbal responsiveness after colonoscope withdrawal. Sedation spectrum was retrieved from the data stored on the SEDLine monitor. Patients sedated with propofol experience significantly deeper degrees of sedation at all times during the procedure. Additionally, during significant part of the procedure, they are at PSI levels associated with deep general anesthesia. The group that received propofol was more deeply sedated and had lower PSI values. Lighter propofol titration protocols may lead to improved patient care such as lowering risk of aspiration and hypotension. The role of processed EEG monitors such as the SEDLine monitor to improve sedation protocols remains to be determined. Trial registration We obtained an ethical clearance from the Institute. No trial registration was mandated, as no interventional drug or investigational device were used during the study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Depth of sedation; Electroencephalogram; Non-propofol sedation; Patient state index; Propofol sedation; SEDLine monitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26364193     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9769-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  25 in total

1.  Bispectral index monitoring of sedation during endoscopy.

Authors:  A L Bower; A Ripepi; J Dilger; N Boparai; F J Brody; J L Ponsky
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  SEDASYS(®), airway, oxygenation, and ventilation: anticipating and managing the challenges.

Authors:  Basavana Gouda Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh; Vinay Chandrasekhara
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  TCI: supplementation and drug interactions.

Authors:  J Vuyk
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The SEDASYS System is not intended for the sedation of high-risk patients.

Authors:  James F Martin; Phillip Bridenbaugh; Michael Gustafson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  The use of ancillary techniques to aid colonoscope insertion.

Authors:  Xhileta Xhaja; James Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Does sedation type affect colonoscopy perforation rates?

Authors:  Adewunmi Adeyemo; Mohsen Bannazadeh; Thomas Riggs; Jason Shellnut; Donald Barkel; Harry Wasvary
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Propofol versus midazolam for conscious sedation guided by processed EEG during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  P Krugliak; B Ziff; Y Rusabrov; A Rosenthal; A Fich; G M Gurman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  A comparison of patient state index and bispectral index values during the perioperative period.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Chen; Jun Tang; Paul F White; Ronald H Wender; Hong Ma; Alexander Sloninsky; Robert Kariger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Upper airway reflexes during a combination of propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.

Authors:  Y Tagaito; S Isono; T Nishino
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Viju P Deenadayalu; Emely Eid; Thomas F Imperiale; John A Walker; Kuldip Sandhu; Anthony C Clarke; Lybus C Hillman; Akira Horiuchi; Lawrence B Cohen; Ludwig T Heuss; Shajan Peter; Christoph Beglinger; James A Sinnott; Thomas Welton; Magdy Rofail; Iyad Subei; Rodger Sleven; Paul Jordan; John Goff; Patrick D Gerstenberger; Harold Munnings; Martin Tagle; Brian W Sipe; Till Wehrmann; Jack A Di Palma; Kaitlin E Occhipinti; Egidio Barbi; Andrea Riphaus; Stephen T Amann; Gen Tohda; Timothy McClellan; Charles Thueson; John Morse; Nizam Meah
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  12 in total

1.  Clinical study of anesthetization by dezocine combined with propofol for indolent colonoscopy.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Xu; Xiao-Liang Zhao; Gui-Ping Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Reply to "State of the Art in Airway Management During GI Endoscopy: The Missing Pieces".

Authors:  Basavana Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Big Sleep: Beyond Propofol Sedation During GI Endoscopy.

Authors:  Basavana Goudra
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Providing Deep Sedation for Advanced Endoscopic Procedures: The Esthetics of Endoscopic Anesthetics.

Authors:  Basavana Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  No increased risk of perforation during colonoscopy in patients undergoing propofol versus traditional sedation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minmin Xue; Jian Tian; Jing Zhang; Hongbin Zhu; Jun Bai; Sujuan Zhang; Qili Wang; Shuge Wang; Xuzheng Song; Donghong Ma; Jia Li; Yongmin Zhang; Wei Li; Dongxu Wang
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 6.  Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite.

Authors:  Katherine B Hagan; Selvi Thirumurthi; Raju Gottumukkala; John Vargo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

Review 7.  Recent Developments in Devices Used for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sedation.

Authors:  Basavana Goudra; Gowri Gouda; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  High Incidence of Burst Suppression during Propofol Sedation for Outpatient Colonoscopy: Lessons Learned from Neuromonitoring.

Authors:  Jamie Bloom; David Wyler; Marc C Torjman; Tuan Trinh; Lucy Li; Amy Mehta; Evan Fitchett; David Kastenberg; Michael Mahla; Victor Romo
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-06-19

9.  Use of LMAⓇ GastroTM in esophagogastroduodenoscopy and endoscopy.

Authors:  Wan-Ling Alyssa Chiew; Qingyan Chen; Leng Zoo Tan
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-01

10.  Replacement of dexmedetomidine loading with midazolam for sedation in elderly patients with spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Sung Wook Park; Jeong-Hyun Choi; Hyung-Tak Kim; Yong Hyun Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.